Not so Subtle Subtleties Regarding PreferencesSource: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 012::page 120301Author:Hazelrigg, George A.
DOI: 10.1115/1.4028940Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The past two decades have seen a significant shift in perspective on engineering design, from the view that design is a matter of problem solving to the view that it is decision making. This shift was encouraged by the ABET 2000 standards, defining design to be decision making, and by numerous papers appearing since, addressing various aspects of decision theory applied to design. It has opened engineering to the richness of the mathematics of decision theory, which holds the potential to deal far more realistically with design than other views, including a rigorous treatment of uncertainty. On the other hand, decision theory defines a decision in a very precise and perhaps limited way that needs to be recognized. Failure to acknowledge this has led to a number of spurious theories that have emerged to cope with the resulting issues. The purpose of this brief note is to explicitly acknowledge some of the conditions that underlie the mathematics of decision theory and to point to their consequences.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Hazelrigg, George A. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:10:47Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:10:47Z | |
| date issued | 2014 | |
| identifier issn | 1050-0472 | |
| identifier other | md_136_12_120301.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/155724 | |
| description abstract | The past two decades have seen a significant shift in perspective on engineering design, from the view that design is a matter of problem solving to the view that it is decision making. This shift was encouraged by the ABET 2000 standards, defining design to be decision making, and by numerous papers appearing since, addressing various aspects of decision theory applied to design. It has opened engineering to the richness of the mathematics of decision theory, which holds the potential to deal far more realistically with design than other views, including a rigorous treatment of uncertainty. On the other hand, decision theory defines a decision in a very precise and perhaps limited way that needs to be recognized. Failure to acknowledge this has led to a number of spurious theories that have emerged to cope with the resulting issues. The purpose of this brief note is to explicitly acknowledge some of the conditions that underlie the mathematics of decision theory and to point to their consequences. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Not so Subtle Subtleties Regarding Preferences | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 136 | |
| journal issue | 12 | |
| journal title | Journal of Mechanical Design | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4028940 | |
| journal fristpage | 120301 | |
| journal lastpage | 120301 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-9001 | |
| tree | Journal of Mechanical Design:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 012 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |