Show simple item record

contributor authorHazelrigg, George A.
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:10:47Z
date available2017-05-09T01:10:47Z
date issued2014
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier othermd_136_12_120301.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/155724
description abstractThe past two decades have seen a significant shift in perspective on engineering design, from the view that design is a matter of problem solving to the view that it is decision making. This shift was encouraged by the ABET 2000 standards, defining design to be decision making, and by numerous papers appearing since, addressing various aspects of decision theory applied to design. It has opened engineering to the richness of the mathematics of decision theory, which holds the potential to deal far more realistically with design than other views, including a rigorous treatment of uncertainty. On the other hand, decision theory defines a decision in a very precise and perhaps limited way that needs to be recognized. Failure to acknowledge this has led to a number of spurious theories that have emerged to cope with the resulting issues. The purpose of this brief note is to explicitly acknowledge some of the conditions that underlie the mathematics of decision theory and to point to their consequences.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleNot so Subtle Subtleties Regarding Preferences
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.4028940
journal fristpage120301
journal lastpage120301
identifier eissn1528-9001
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record