contributor author | Helms, Michael | |
contributor author | Goel, Ashok K. | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:10:46Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T01:10:46Z | |
date issued | 2014 | |
identifier issn | 1050-0472 | |
identifier other | md_136_11_111106.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/155714 | |
description abstract | Searching for biological analogies appropriate for design problems is a core process of biologically inspired design (BID). Through in situ observations of student BIDs, we discovered that student designers struggle with two issues that bookend the problem of search: design problem formulation, which generates the set of conditions to be used for search; and evaluation of the appropriateness of the retrieved analogies, which depends both on problem formulation and the retrieved analogy. We describe a method for problem formulation and analogy evaluation in BID that we call the FourBox method. We show that the FourBox method can be rapidly and accurately used by designers for both problem formulation and analogy evaluation, and that designers find the method valuable for the intended tasks. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | The Four Box Method: Problem Formulation and Analogy Evaluation in Biologically Inspired Design | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 136 | |
journal issue | 11 | |
journal title | Journal of Mechanical Design | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4028172 | |
journal fristpage | 111106 | |
journal lastpage | 111106 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-9001 | |
tree | Journal of Mechanical Design:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 011 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |