Show simple item record

contributor authorHelms, Michael
contributor authorGoel, Ashok K.
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:10:46Z
date available2017-05-09T01:10:46Z
date issued2014
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier othermd_136_11_111106.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/155714
description abstractSearching for biological analogies appropriate for design problems is a core process of biologically inspired design (BID). Through in situ observations of student BIDs, we discovered that student designers struggle with two issues that bookend the problem of search: design problem formulation, which generates the set of conditions to be used for search; and evaluation of the appropriateness of the retrieved analogies, which depends both on problem formulation and the retrieved analogy. We describe a method for problem formulation and analogy evaluation in BID that we call the FourBox method. We show that the FourBox method can be rapidly and accurately used by designers for both problem formulation and analogy evaluation, and that designers find the method valuable for the intended tasks.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleThe Four Box Method: Problem Formulation and Analogy Evaluation in Biologically Inspired Design
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.4028172
journal fristpage111106
journal lastpage111106
identifier eissn1528-9001
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record