Show simple item record

contributor authorSchmid, Robert
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:06:41Z
date available2017-05-09T01:06:41Z
date issued2014
identifier issn0022-0434
identifier otherds_136_05_055501.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/154421
description abstractThis paper offers some comments on the article by Zhu and Cai (2012, “A Simple Switching Control for Linear Systems to Assure Nonovershooting Step Responses,â€‌ ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas., Control, 134, p. 034503). The authors offered a nonlinear switching scheme to obtain a nonovershooting step response from a linear plant, and motivated their method by showing that no linear ProportionalIntegralDerivative (PID) controller could achieve a nonovershooting response for a plant in the form of a triple integrator. In this paper, we show via an example that a linear state feedback controller in conjunction with a Luenberger observer can be found to achieve a nonovershooting response for a triple integrator.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleDiscussion: “A Simple Switching Control for Linear Systems to Assure Nonovershooting Step Responsesâ€‌ (Zhu, B., and Cai, K. Y., 2012, ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas., Control, 134, p. 034503)
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
identifier doi10.1115/1.4027458
journal fristpage55501
journal lastpage55501
identifier eissn1528-9028
treeJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record