YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Improving Tilting Pad Journal Bearing Predictions—Part I: Model Development and Impact of Rotor Excited Versus Bearing Excited Impedance Coefficients

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 001::page 12502
    Author:
    Wilkes, Jason C.
    ,
    Childs, Dara W.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4007367
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The floatingbearingtestrig concept was initially developed by Glienicke in 1966 and has since been used to test many tiltingpad journal bearings (TPJBs). The impedances measured during these tests have been compared to rotor/journalperturbed impedance predictions. Since the inertial acceleration of a pad is different for bearingperturbed and rotorperturbed motions, the bearing's reaction force components for bearingperturbed and journalperturbed motions will also differ. An understanding of how bearingperturbed and rotorperturbed impedances differ is needed to assess the validity of past, present, and future comparisons between TPJB test data and predictions. A new TPJB perturbation model is developed including the effects of angular, radial, and transverse pad motion and changes in pad clearance due to pad bending compliance. Though all of these pad variables have previously been included in different analyses, there are no publications containing perturbations of all four variables. In addition, previous researchers have only perturbed the rotor, while both the bearing and rotor motions are perturbed in the present analysis. The applicability of comparing rotorperturbed bearing impedance predictions to impedances measured on a bearingperturbed test rig is assessed by comparing rotorperturbed and bearingperturbed impedance predictions for an example bearing.
    • Download: (1.557Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Improving Tilting Pad Journal Bearing Predictions—Part I: Model Development and Impact of Rotor Excited Versus Bearing Excited Impedance Coefficients

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/151536
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWilkes, Jason C.
    contributor authorChilds, Dara W.
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:57:59Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:57:59Z
    date issued2013
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier othergtp_135_1_012502.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/151536
    description abstractThe floatingbearingtestrig concept was initially developed by Glienicke in 1966 and has since been used to test many tiltingpad journal bearings (TPJBs). The impedances measured during these tests have been compared to rotor/journalperturbed impedance predictions. Since the inertial acceleration of a pad is different for bearingperturbed and rotorperturbed motions, the bearing's reaction force components for bearingperturbed and journalperturbed motions will also differ. An understanding of how bearingperturbed and rotorperturbed impedances differ is needed to assess the validity of past, present, and future comparisons between TPJB test data and predictions. A new TPJB perturbation model is developed including the effects of angular, radial, and transverse pad motion and changes in pad clearance due to pad bending compliance. Though all of these pad variables have previously been included in different analyses, there are no publications containing perturbations of all four variables. In addition, previous researchers have only perturbed the rotor, while both the bearing and rotor motions are perturbed in the present analysis. The applicability of comparing rotorperturbed bearing impedance predictions to impedances measured on a bearingperturbed test rig is assessed by comparing rotorperturbed and bearingperturbed impedance predictions for an example bearing.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleImproving Tilting Pad Journal Bearing Predictions—Part I: Model Development and Impact of Rotor Excited Versus Bearing Excited Impedance Coefficients
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume135
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4007367
    journal fristpage12502
    journal lastpage12502
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian