YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Propane and Methane Performance and Emissions in a Turbocharged Direct Injection Dual Fuel Engine

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 009::page 92806
    Author:
    C. M. Gibson
    ,
    A. C. Polk
    ,
    N. T. Shoemaker
    ,
    K. K. Srinivasan
    ,
    S. R. Krishnan
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4002895
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: With increasingly restrictive NOx and particulate matter emissions standards, the recent discovery of new natural gas reserves, and the possibility of producing propane efficiently from biomass sources, dual fueling strategies have become more attractive. This paper presents experimental results from dual fuel operation of a four-cylinder turbocharged direct injection (DI) diesel engine with propane or methane (a natural gas surrogate) as the primary fuel and diesel as the ignition source. Experiments were performed with the stock engine control unit at a constant speed of 1800 rpm, and a wide range of brake mean effective pressures (BMEPs) (2.7–11.6 bars) and percent energy substitutions (PESs) of C3H8 and CH4. Brake thermal efficiencies (BTEs) and emissions (NOx, smoke, total hydrocarbons (THCs), CO, and CO2) were measured. Maximum PES levels of about 80–95% with CH4 and 40–92% with C3H8 were achieved. Maximum PES was limited by poor combustion efficiencies and engine misfire at low loads for both C3H8 and CH4, and the onset of knock above 9 bar BMEP for C3H8. While dual fuel BTEs were lower than straight diesel BTEs at low loads, they approached diesel BTE values at high loads. For dual fuel operation, NOx and smoke reductions (from diesel values) were as high as 66–68% and 97%, respectively, but CO and THC emissions were significantly higher with increasing PES at all engine loads.
    keyword(s): Fuels , Engines , Stress , Diesel , Emissions , Brakes , Methane , Smoke AND Combustion ,
    • Download: (1.104Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Propane and Methane Performance and Emissions in a Turbocharged Direct Injection Dual Fuel Engine

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/145956
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorC. M. Gibson
    contributor authorA. C. Polk
    contributor authorN. T. Shoemaker
    contributor authorK. K. Srinivasan
    contributor authorS. R. Krishnan
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:43:31Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:43:31Z
    date copyrightSeptember, 2011
    date issued2011
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-27172#092806_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/145956
    description abstractWith increasingly restrictive NOx and particulate matter emissions standards, the recent discovery of new natural gas reserves, and the possibility of producing propane efficiently from biomass sources, dual fueling strategies have become more attractive. This paper presents experimental results from dual fuel operation of a four-cylinder turbocharged direct injection (DI) diesel engine with propane or methane (a natural gas surrogate) as the primary fuel and diesel as the ignition source. Experiments were performed with the stock engine control unit at a constant speed of 1800 rpm, and a wide range of brake mean effective pressures (BMEPs) (2.7–11.6 bars) and percent energy substitutions (PESs) of C3H8 and CH4. Brake thermal efficiencies (BTEs) and emissions (NOx, smoke, total hydrocarbons (THCs), CO, and CO2) were measured. Maximum PES levels of about 80–95% with CH4 and 40–92% with C3H8 were achieved. Maximum PES was limited by poor combustion efficiencies and engine misfire at low loads for both C3H8 and CH4, and the onset of knock above 9 bar BMEP for C3H8. While dual fuel BTEs were lower than straight diesel BTEs at low loads, they approached diesel BTE values at high loads. For dual fuel operation, NOx and smoke reductions (from diesel values) were as high as 66–68% and 97%, respectively, but CO and THC emissions were significantly higher with increasing PES at all engine loads.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparison of Propane and Methane Performance and Emissions in a Turbocharged Direct Injection Dual Fuel Engine
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume133
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4002895
    journal fristpage92806
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsFuels
    keywordsEngines
    keywordsStress
    keywordsDiesel
    keywordsEmissions
    keywordsBrakes
    keywordsMethane
    keywordsSmoke AND Combustion
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian