YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Impact of Simplified Boundary Conditions and Aortic Arch Inclusion on CFD Simulations in the Mouse Aorta: A Comparison With Mouse-specific Reference Data

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 012::page 121006
    Author:
    Bram Trachet
    ,
    Joris Bols
    ,
    Gianluca De Santis
    ,
    Stefaan Vandenberghe
    ,
    Bart Loeys
    ,
    Patrick Segers
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4005479
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations allow for calculation of a detailed flow field in the mouse aorta and can thus be used to investigate a potential link between local hemodynamics and disease development. To perform these simulations in a murine setting, one often needs to make assumptions (e.g. when mouse-specific boundary conditions are not available), but many of these assumptions have not been validated due to a lack of reference data. In this study, we present such a reference data set by combining high-frequency ultrasound and contrast-enhanced micro-CT to measure (in vivo) the time-dependent volumetric flow waveforms in the complete aorta (including seven major side branches) of 10 male ApoE -/- deficient mice on a C57Bl/6 background. In order to assess the influence of some assumptions that are commonly applied in literature, four different CFD simulations were set up for each animal: (i) imposing the measured volumetric flow waveforms, (ii) imposing the average flow fractions over all 10 animals, presented as a reference data set, (iii) imposing flow fractions calculated by Murray’s law, and (iv) restricting the geometrical model to the abdominal aorta (imposing measured flows). We found that – even if there is sometimes significant variation in the flow fractions going to a particular branch – the influence of using average flow fractions on the CFD simulations is limited and often restricted to the side branches. On the other hand, Murray’s law underestimates the fraction going to the brachiocephalic trunk and strongly overestimates the fraction going to the distal aorta, influencing the outcome of the CFD results significantly. Changing the exponential factor in Murray’s law equation from 3 to 2 (as suggested by several authors in literature) yields results that correspond much better to those obtained imposing the average flow fractions. Restricting the geometrical model to the abdominal aorta did not influence the outcome of the CFD simulations. In conclusion, the presented reference dataset can be used to impose boundary conditions in the mouse aorta in future studies, keeping in mind that they represent a subsample of the total population, i.e., relatively old, non-diseased, male C57Bl/6 ApoE -/- mice.
    keyword(s): Flow (Dynamics) , Computational fluid dynamics , Engineering simulation , Bifurcation , Boundary-value problems , Aorta , Outflow , Arches , Measurement , Hemodynamics AND Ultrasound ,
    • Download: (2.656Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Impact of Simplified Boundary Conditions and Aortic Arch Inclusion on CFD Simulations in the Mouse Aorta: A Comparison With Mouse-specific Reference Data

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/145338
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBram Trachet
    contributor authorJoris Bols
    contributor authorGianluca De Santis
    contributor authorStefaan Vandenberghe
    contributor authorBart Loeys
    contributor authorPatrick Segers
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:42:17Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:42:17Z
    date copyrightDecember, 2011
    date issued2011
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherJBENDY-27235#121006_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/145338
    description abstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations allow for calculation of a detailed flow field in the mouse aorta and can thus be used to investigate a potential link between local hemodynamics and disease development. To perform these simulations in a murine setting, one often needs to make assumptions (e.g. when mouse-specific boundary conditions are not available), but many of these assumptions have not been validated due to a lack of reference data. In this study, we present such a reference data set by combining high-frequency ultrasound and contrast-enhanced micro-CT to measure (in vivo) the time-dependent volumetric flow waveforms in the complete aorta (including seven major side branches) of 10 male ApoE -/- deficient mice on a C57Bl/6 background. In order to assess the influence of some assumptions that are commonly applied in literature, four different CFD simulations were set up for each animal: (i) imposing the measured volumetric flow waveforms, (ii) imposing the average flow fractions over all 10 animals, presented as a reference data set, (iii) imposing flow fractions calculated by Murray’s law, and (iv) restricting the geometrical model to the abdominal aorta (imposing measured flows). We found that – even if there is sometimes significant variation in the flow fractions going to a particular branch – the influence of using average flow fractions on the CFD simulations is limited and often restricted to the side branches. On the other hand, Murray’s law underestimates the fraction going to the brachiocephalic trunk and strongly overestimates the fraction going to the distal aorta, influencing the outcome of the CFD results significantly. Changing the exponential factor in Murray’s law equation from 3 to 2 (as suggested by several authors in literature) yields results that correspond much better to those obtained imposing the average flow fractions. Restricting the geometrical model to the abdominal aorta did not influence the outcome of the CFD simulations. In conclusion, the presented reference dataset can be used to impose boundary conditions in the mouse aorta in future studies, keeping in mind that they represent a subsample of the total population, i.e., relatively old, non-diseased, male C57Bl/6 ApoE -/- mice.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThe Impact of Simplified Boundary Conditions and Aortic Arch Inclusion on CFD Simulations in the Mouse Aorta: A Comparison With Mouse-specific Reference Data
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume133
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4005479
    journal fristpage121006
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsComputational fluid dynamics
    keywordsEngineering simulation
    keywordsBifurcation
    keywordsBoundary-value problems
    keywordsAorta
    keywordsOutflow
    keywordsArches
    keywordsMeasurement
    keywordsHemodynamics AND Ultrasound
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian