The Impact of Simplified Boundary Conditions and Aortic Arch Inclusion on CFD Simulations in the Mouse Aorta: A Comparison With Mouse-specific Reference DataSource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 012::page 121006Author:Bram Trachet
,
Joris Bols
,
Gianluca De Santis
,
Stefaan Vandenberghe
,
Bart Loeys
,
Patrick Segers
DOI: 10.1115/1.4005479Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations allow for calculation of a detailed flow field in the mouse aorta and can thus be used to investigate a potential link between local hemodynamics and disease development. To perform these simulations in a murine setting, one often needs to make assumptions (e.g. when mouse-specific boundary conditions are not available), but many of these assumptions have not been validated due to a lack of reference data. In this study, we present such a reference data set by combining high-frequency ultrasound and contrast-enhanced micro-CT to measure (in vivo) the time-dependent volumetric flow waveforms in the complete aorta (including seven major side branches) of 10 male ApoE -/- deficient mice on a C57Bl/6 background. In order to assess the influence of some assumptions that are commonly applied in literature, four different CFD simulations were set up for each animal: (i) imposing the measured volumetric flow waveforms, (ii) imposing the average flow fractions over all 10 animals, presented as a reference data set, (iii) imposing flow fractions calculated by Murray’s law, and (iv) restricting the geometrical model to the abdominal aorta (imposing measured flows). We found that – even if there is sometimes significant variation in the flow fractions going to a particular branch – the influence of using average flow fractions on the CFD simulations is limited and often restricted to the side branches. On the other hand, Murray’s law underestimates the fraction going to the brachiocephalic trunk and strongly overestimates the fraction going to the distal aorta, influencing the outcome of the CFD results significantly. Changing the exponential factor in Murray’s law equation from 3 to 2 (as suggested by several authors in literature) yields results that correspond much better to those obtained imposing the average flow fractions. Restricting the geometrical model to the abdominal aorta did not influence the outcome of the CFD simulations. In conclusion, the presented reference dataset can be used to impose boundary conditions in the mouse aorta in future studies, keeping in mind that they represent a subsample of the total population, i.e., relatively old, non-diseased, male C57Bl/6 ApoE -/- mice.
keyword(s): Flow (Dynamics) , Computational fluid dynamics , Engineering simulation , Bifurcation , Boundary-value problems , Aorta , Outflow , Arches , Measurement , Hemodynamics AND Ultrasound ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Bram Trachet | |
| contributor author | Joris Bols | |
| contributor author | Gianluca De Santis | |
| contributor author | Stefaan Vandenberghe | |
| contributor author | Bart Loeys | |
| contributor author | Patrick Segers | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:42:17Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:42:17Z | |
| date copyright | December, 2011 | |
| date issued | 2011 | |
| identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
| identifier other | JBENDY-27235#121006_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/145338 | |
| description abstract | Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations allow for calculation of a detailed flow field in the mouse aorta and can thus be used to investigate a potential link between local hemodynamics and disease development. To perform these simulations in a murine setting, one often needs to make assumptions (e.g. when mouse-specific boundary conditions are not available), but many of these assumptions have not been validated due to a lack of reference data. In this study, we present such a reference data set by combining high-frequency ultrasound and contrast-enhanced micro-CT to measure (in vivo) the time-dependent volumetric flow waveforms in the complete aorta (including seven major side branches) of 10 male ApoE -/- deficient mice on a C57Bl/6 background. In order to assess the influence of some assumptions that are commonly applied in literature, four different CFD simulations were set up for each animal: (i) imposing the measured volumetric flow waveforms, (ii) imposing the average flow fractions over all 10 animals, presented as a reference data set, (iii) imposing flow fractions calculated by Murray’s law, and (iv) restricting the geometrical model to the abdominal aorta (imposing measured flows). We found that – even if there is sometimes significant variation in the flow fractions going to a particular branch – the influence of using average flow fractions on the CFD simulations is limited and often restricted to the side branches. On the other hand, Murray’s law underestimates the fraction going to the brachiocephalic trunk and strongly overestimates the fraction going to the distal aorta, influencing the outcome of the CFD results significantly. Changing the exponential factor in Murray’s law equation from 3 to 2 (as suggested by several authors in literature) yields results that correspond much better to those obtained imposing the average flow fractions. Restricting the geometrical model to the abdominal aorta did not influence the outcome of the CFD simulations. In conclusion, the presented reference dataset can be used to impose boundary conditions in the mouse aorta in future studies, keeping in mind that they represent a subsample of the total population, i.e., relatively old, non-diseased, male C57Bl/6 ApoE -/- mice. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | The Impact of Simplified Boundary Conditions and Aortic Arch Inclusion on CFD Simulations in the Mouse Aorta: A Comparison With Mouse-specific Reference Data | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 133 | |
| journal issue | 12 | |
| journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4005479 | |
| journal fristpage | 121006 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8951 | |
| keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
| keywords | Computational fluid dynamics | |
| keywords | Engineering simulation | |
| keywords | Bifurcation | |
| keywords | Boundary-value problems | |
| keywords | Aorta | |
| keywords | Outflow | |
| keywords | Arches | |
| keywords | Measurement | |
| keywords | Hemodynamics AND Ultrasound | |
| tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 012 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |