Show simple item record

contributor authorBram Trachet
contributor authorJoris Bols
contributor authorGianluca De Santis
contributor authorStefaan Vandenberghe
contributor authorBart Loeys
contributor authorPatrick Segers
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:42:17Z
date available2017-05-09T00:42:17Z
date copyrightDecember, 2011
date issued2011
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherJBENDY-27235#121006_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/145338
description abstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations allow for calculation of a detailed flow field in the mouse aorta and can thus be used to investigate a potential link between local hemodynamics and disease development. To perform these simulations in a murine setting, one often needs to make assumptions (e.g. when mouse-specific boundary conditions are not available), but many of these assumptions have not been validated due to a lack of reference data. In this study, we present such a reference data set by combining high-frequency ultrasound and contrast-enhanced micro-CT to measure (in vivo) the time-dependent volumetric flow waveforms in the complete aorta (including seven major side branches) of 10 male ApoE -/- deficient mice on a C57Bl/6 background. In order to assess the influence of some assumptions that are commonly applied in literature, four different CFD simulations were set up for each animal: (i) imposing the measured volumetric flow waveforms, (ii) imposing the average flow fractions over all 10 animals, presented as a reference data set, (iii) imposing flow fractions calculated by Murray’s law, and (iv) restricting the geometrical model to the abdominal aorta (imposing measured flows). We found that – even if there is sometimes significant variation in the flow fractions going to a particular branch – the influence of using average flow fractions on the CFD simulations is limited and often restricted to the side branches. On the other hand, Murray’s law underestimates the fraction going to the brachiocephalic trunk and strongly overestimates the fraction going to the distal aorta, influencing the outcome of the CFD results significantly. Changing the exponential factor in Murray’s law equation from 3 to 2 (as suggested by several authors in literature) yields results that correspond much better to those obtained imposing the average flow fractions. Restricting the geometrical model to the abdominal aorta did not influence the outcome of the CFD simulations. In conclusion, the presented reference dataset can be used to impose boundary conditions in the mouse aorta in future studies, keeping in mind that they represent a subsample of the total population, i.e., relatively old, non-diseased, male C57Bl/6 ApoE -/- mice.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleThe Impact of Simplified Boundary Conditions and Aortic Arch Inclusion on CFD Simulations in the Mouse Aorta: A Comparison With Mouse-specific Reference Data
typeJournal Paper
journal volume133
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4005479
journal fristpage121006
identifier eissn1528-8951
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsComputational fluid dynamics
keywordsEngineering simulation
keywordsBifurcation
keywordsBoundary-value problems
keywordsAorta
keywordsOutflow
keywordsArches
keywordsMeasurement
keywordsHemodynamics AND Ultrasound
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record