YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Performance of Heat Pump Water Heater (HPWH) Systems and Their Impacts on Electric Utility Loads

    Source: Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications:;2010:;volume( 002 ):;issue: 002::page 21008
    Author:
    Yahya I. Sharaf-Eldeen
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4002757
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This work involves measurements, analyses, and evaluation of performance of air-source heat pump water heaters (HPWHs), and their impacts on electric utility loads. Two add-on, heat pumps (HPs) rated at 7000 BTU/h (2.051 kW) and 12,000 BTU/h (3.517 kW) were utilized. The HPs were retrofitted to two 50 gal (189.3 l) electric water heaters (EWHs) with their electric heating elements removed. A third standard EWH was used for comparison. The testing setups were fully instrumented for measurements of all pertinent parameters, including inlet and outlet water temperatures, inlet and outlet air temperatures of the HPs, temperature and humidity of the surrounding air, volume of water drawn out of the storage tanks, as well as the electric energy consumptions of the systems. Performance measures evaluated included the coefficient of performance, the energy factor (EF), and the first hour rating (FHR). The HPWH systems gave EFs ranging from 1.8 to 2.5 and corresponding energy savings (and reductions in utility peak loads) ranging from 49.0% to 63.0%, approximately. The values obtained in the summer months were, as expected, somewhat higher than those obtained in the winter ones. The average values of the EFs and energy savings (and reductions in utility peak loads) were about 2.1 and 56.0%, respectively. FHR results were much lower for the HPWHs compared with those for the standard EWH. These results show that HPWHs are much more efficient compared with standard EWHs. While the average value of the EF for the EWH was about 0.92, the HPWHs yielded EFs averaging more than 2.00, resulting in annual energy savings averaging more than 50%. The results also show that HPWHs are effective at reducing utility peak loads, in addition to providing substantial cost savings to consumers.
    keyword(s): Temperature , Stress , Testing , Heat pumps , Water , Hot water , Water temperature , Electrical resistance , Measurement AND Storage tanks ,
    • Download: (419.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Performance of Heat Pump Water Heater (HPWH) Systems and Their Impacts on Electric Utility Loads

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/144842
    Collections
    • Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYahya I. Sharaf-Eldeen
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:40:56Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:40:56Z
    date copyrightJune, 2010
    date issued2010
    identifier issn1948-5085
    identifier otherJTSEBV-28817#021008_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/144842
    description abstractThis work involves measurements, analyses, and evaluation of performance of air-source heat pump water heaters (HPWHs), and their impacts on electric utility loads. Two add-on, heat pumps (HPs) rated at 7000 BTU/h (2.051 kW) and 12,000 BTU/h (3.517 kW) were utilized. The HPs were retrofitted to two 50 gal (189.3 l) electric water heaters (EWHs) with their electric heating elements removed. A third standard EWH was used for comparison. The testing setups were fully instrumented for measurements of all pertinent parameters, including inlet and outlet water temperatures, inlet and outlet air temperatures of the HPs, temperature and humidity of the surrounding air, volume of water drawn out of the storage tanks, as well as the electric energy consumptions of the systems. Performance measures evaluated included the coefficient of performance, the energy factor (EF), and the first hour rating (FHR). The HPWH systems gave EFs ranging from 1.8 to 2.5 and corresponding energy savings (and reductions in utility peak loads) ranging from 49.0% to 63.0%, approximately. The values obtained in the summer months were, as expected, somewhat higher than those obtained in the winter ones. The average values of the EFs and energy savings (and reductions in utility peak loads) were about 2.1 and 56.0%, respectively. FHR results were much lower for the HPWHs compared with those for the standard EWH. These results show that HPWHs are much more efficient compared with standard EWHs. While the average value of the EF for the EWH was about 0.92, the HPWHs yielded EFs averaging more than 2.00, resulting in annual energy savings averaging more than 50%. The results also show that HPWHs are effective at reducing utility peak loads, in addition to providing substantial cost savings to consumers.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titlePerformance of Heat Pump Water Heater (HPWH) Systems and Their Impacts on Electric Utility Loads
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume2
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4002757
    journal fristpage21008
    identifier eissn1948-5093
    keywordsTemperature
    keywordsStress
    keywordsTesting
    keywordsHeat pumps
    keywordsWater
    keywordsHot water
    keywordsWater temperature
    keywordsElectrical resistance
    keywordsMeasurement AND Storage tanks
    treeJournal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications:;2010:;volume( 002 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian