YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Three Microturbine Primary Surface Recuperator Alloys

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 002::page 22302
    Author:
    Wendy J. Matthews
    ,
    Karren L. More
    ,
    Larry R. Walker
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3157094
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Extensive work performed by Capstone Turbine Corporation, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and various others has shown that the traditional primary surface recuperator alloy, type 347 stainless steel, is unsuitable for applications above 650°C(∼1200°F). Numerous studies have shown that the presence of water vapor greatly accelerates the oxidation rate of type 347 stainless steel at temperatures above 650°C(∼1200°F). Water vapor is present as a product of combustion in the microturbine exhaust, making it necessary to find replacement alloys for type 347 stainless steel that will meet the long life requirements of microturbine primary surface recuperators. It has been well established over the past few years that alloys with higher chromium and nickel contents than type 347 stainless steel have much greater oxidation resistance in the microturbine environment. One such alloy that has replaced type 347 stainless steel in primary surface recuperators is Haynes Alloy HR-120 (Haynes and HR-120 are trademarks of Haynes International, Inc.), a solid-solution-strengthened alloy with nominally 33 wt % Fe, 37 wt % Ni and 25 wt % Cr. Unfortunately, while HR-120 is significantly more oxidation resistant in the microturbine environment, it is also a much more expensive alloy. In the interest of cost reduction, other candidate primary surface recuperator alloys are being investigated as possible alternatives to type 347 stainless steel. An initial rainbow recuperator test has been performed at Capstone to compare the oxidation resistance of type 347 stainless steel, HR-120, and the Allegheny Ludlum austenitic alloy AL 20–25+Nb (AL 20–25+Nb is a trademark of ATI Properties, Inc. and is licensed to Allegheny Ludlum Corporation). Evaluation of surface oxide scale formation and associated alloy depletion and other compositional changes has been carried out at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The results of this initial rainbow test will be presented and discussed in this paper.
    keyword(s): Temperature , Alloys , Microturbines , oxidation , Electrical resistance , Engines , Turbines , Stainless steel , Testing , Grain boundaries , Water vapor , Combustion AND Exhaust systems ,
    • Download: (807.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Three Microturbine Primary Surface Recuperator Alloys

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/143277
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWendy J. Matthews
    contributor authorKarren L. More
    contributor authorLarry R. Walker
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:37:52Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:37:52Z
    date copyrightFebruary, 2010
    date issued2010
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-27094#022302_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/143277
    description abstractExtensive work performed by Capstone Turbine Corporation, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and various others has shown that the traditional primary surface recuperator alloy, type 347 stainless steel, is unsuitable for applications above 650°C(∼1200°F). Numerous studies have shown that the presence of water vapor greatly accelerates the oxidation rate of type 347 stainless steel at temperatures above 650°C(∼1200°F). Water vapor is present as a product of combustion in the microturbine exhaust, making it necessary to find replacement alloys for type 347 stainless steel that will meet the long life requirements of microturbine primary surface recuperators. It has been well established over the past few years that alloys with higher chromium and nickel contents than type 347 stainless steel have much greater oxidation resistance in the microturbine environment. One such alloy that has replaced type 347 stainless steel in primary surface recuperators is Haynes Alloy HR-120 (Haynes and HR-120 are trademarks of Haynes International, Inc.), a solid-solution-strengthened alloy with nominally 33 wt % Fe, 37 wt % Ni and 25 wt % Cr. Unfortunately, while HR-120 is significantly more oxidation resistant in the microturbine environment, it is also a much more expensive alloy. In the interest of cost reduction, other candidate primary surface recuperator alloys are being investigated as possible alternatives to type 347 stainless steel. An initial rainbow recuperator test has been performed at Capstone to compare the oxidation resistance of type 347 stainless steel, HR-120, and the Allegheny Ludlum austenitic alloy AL 20–25+Nb (AL 20–25+Nb is a trademark of ATI Properties, Inc. and is licensed to Allegheny Ludlum Corporation). Evaluation of surface oxide scale formation and associated alloy depletion and other compositional changes has been carried out at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The results of this initial rainbow test will be presented and discussed in this paper.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparison of Three Microturbine Primary Surface Recuperator Alloys
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume132
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3157094
    journal fristpage22302
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsTemperature
    keywordsAlloys
    keywordsMicroturbines
    keywordsoxidation
    keywordsElectrical resistance
    keywordsEngines
    keywordsTurbines
    keywordsStainless steel
    keywordsTesting
    keywordsGrain boundaries
    keywordsWater vapor
    keywordsCombustion AND Exhaust systems
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian