YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Gas Turbine Engine Emissions—Part I: Volatile Organic Compounds and Nitrogen Oxides

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 006::page 61504
    Author:
    Michael T. Timko
    ,
    W. Berk Knighton
    ,
    Scott C. Herndon
    ,
    Ezra C. Wood
    ,
    Timothy B. Onasch
    ,
    Megan J. Northway
    ,
    John T. Jayne
    ,
    Manjula R. Canagaratna
    ,
    Richard C. Miake-Lye
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4000131
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The potential human health and environmental impacts of aircraft gas turbine engine emissions during normal airport operation are issues of growing concern. During the JETS/Aircraft Particle Emissions eXperiment(APEX)-2 and APEX-3 field campaigns, we performed an extensive series of gas phase and particulate emissions measurements of on-wing gas turbine engines. In all, nine different CFM56 style engines (including both CFM56-3B1 and -7B22 models) and seven additional engines (two RB211-535E4-B engines, three AE3007 engines, one PW4158, and one CJ6108A) were studied to evaluate engine-to-engine variability. Specific gas-phase measurements include NO2, NO, and total NOx, HCHO, C2H4, CO, and a range of volatile organic compounds (e.g., benzene, styrene, toluene, naphthalene). A number of broad conclusions can be made based on the gas-phase data set: (1) field measurements of gas-phase emission indices (EIs) are generally consistent with ICAO certification values; (2) speciation of gas phase NOx between NO and NO2 is reproducible for different engine types and favors NO2 at low power (and low fuel flow rate) and NO at high power (high fuel flow rate); (3) emission indices of gas-phase organic compounds and CO decrease rapidly with increasing fuel flow rate; (4) plotting EI-CO or volatile organic compound EIs against fuel flow rate collapses much of the variability between the different engines, with one exception (AE3007); (5) HCHO, ethylene, acetaldehyde, and propene are the most abundant volatile organic compounds present in the exhaust gases that we can detect, independent of engine technology differences. Empirical correlations accurate to within 30% and based on the publicly available engine parameters are presented for estimating EI-NOx and EI-NO2. Engine-to-engine variability, unavailability of combustor input conditions, changing ambient temperatures, and complex reaction dynamics limit the accuracy of global correlations for CO or volatile organic compound EIs.
    keyword(s): Engines , Organic compounds , Emissions , Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy , Fuels , Nitrogen oxides , Flow (Dynamics) , Measurement , Exhaust systems AND Gas turbines ,
    • Download: (273.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Gas Turbine Engine Emissions—Part I: Volatile Organic Compounds and Nitrogen Oxides

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/143175
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMichael T. Timko
    contributor authorW. Berk Knighton
    contributor authorScott C. Herndon
    contributor authorEzra C. Wood
    contributor authorTimothy B. Onasch
    contributor authorMegan J. Northway
    contributor authorJohn T. Jayne
    contributor authorManjula R. Canagaratna
    contributor authorRichard C. Miake-Lye
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:37:40Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:37:40Z
    date copyrightJune, 2010
    date issued2010
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-27116#061504_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/143175
    description abstractThe potential human health and environmental impacts of aircraft gas turbine engine emissions during normal airport operation are issues of growing concern. During the JETS/Aircraft Particle Emissions eXperiment(APEX)-2 and APEX-3 field campaigns, we performed an extensive series of gas phase and particulate emissions measurements of on-wing gas turbine engines. In all, nine different CFM56 style engines (including both CFM56-3B1 and -7B22 models) and seven additional engines (two RB211-535E4-B engines, three AE3007 engines, one PW4158, and one CJ6108A) were studied to evaluate engine-to-engine variability. Specific gas-phase measurements include NO2, NO, and total NOx, HCHO, C2H4, CO, and a range of volatile organic compounds (e.g., benzene, styrene, toluene, naphthalene). A number of broad conclusions can be made based on the gas-phase data set: (1) field measurements of gas-phase emission indices (EIs) are generally consistent with ICAO certification values; (2) speciation of gas phase NOx between NO and NO2 is reproducible for different engine types and favors NO2 at low power (and low fuel flow rate) and NO at high power (high fuel flow rate); (3) emission indices of gas-phase organic compounds and CO decrease rapidly with increasing fuel flow rate; (4) plotting EI-CO or volatile organic compound EIs against fuel flow rate collapses much of the variability between the different engines, with one exception (AE3007); (5) HCHO, ethylene, acetaldehyde, and propene are the most abundant volatile organic compounds present in the exhaust gases that we can detect, independent of engine technology differences. Empirical correlations accurate to within 30% and based on the publicly available engine parameters are presented for estimating EI-NOx and EI-NO2. Engine-to-engine variability, unavailability of combustor input conditions, changing ambient temperatures, and complex reaction dynamics limit the accuracy of global correlations for CO or volatile organic compound EIs.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleGas Turbine Engine Emissions—Part I: Volatile Organic Compounds and Nitrogen Oxides
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume132
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4000131
    journal fristpage61504
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsEngines
    keywordsOrganic compounds
    keywordsEmissions
    keywordsElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy
    keywordsFuels
    keywordsNitrogen oxides
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsMeasurement
    keywordsExhaust systems AND Gas turbines
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian