YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of Two Trending Strategies for Gas Turbine Performance Prediction

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 004::page 41601
    Author:
    Rajat Sekhon
    ,
    Hany Bassily
    ,
    John Wagner
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2898838
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Complex multidomain dynamic systems demand reliable health monitoring to minimize breakdowns and downtime, thereby enabling cost savings and increased operator safety. Diagnostic and prognostic strategies monitor a system’s transient and steady-state operations, detecting deviations from normal operating scenarios and warning operators of potential system anomalies. System diagnostics detect, identify, and isolate a system fault while prognostics offer strategies to predict system behavior at a future operating time to define the useful period before failure criterion is reached. This paper presents the development and the experimental application of two methods to predict the system behavior based on trends in performance. Statistical regression concepts have been used to analyze dynamic plant signals, and based on these results, future plant operation was estimated. Wavelet transforms were used to condition the signal, and the denoised signals were subsequently forecast. The case study presented here applies the two methodologies to the operational data from a simple cycle 85MW General Electric gas turbine. Those operating data were used to train and validate the algorithms. A comparison of the two methodologies reveals that the wavelet forecast is better than the statistical strategy with lower forecasting error. The developed approaches may be used in parallel with a diagnostic algorithm to monitor gas turbine system behavior.
    keyword(s): Gas turbines , Signals , Wavelets , Turbines , Errors AND Industrial plants ,
    • Download: (1.398Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of Two Trending Strategies for Gas Turbine Performance Prediction

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/137894
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRajat Sekhon
    contributor authorHany Bassily
    contributor authorJohn Wagner
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:27:51Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:27:51Z
    date copyrightJuly, 2008
    date issued2008
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-27026#041601_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/137894
    description abstractComplex multidomain dynamic systems demand reliable health monitoring to minimize breakdowns and downtime, thereby enabling cost savings and increased operator safety. Diagnostic and prognostic strategies monitor a system’s transient and steady-state operations, detecting deviations from normal operating scenarios and warning operators of potential system anomalies. System diagnostics detect, identify, and isolate a system fault while prognostics offer strategies to predict system behavior at a future operating time to define the useful period before failure criterion is reached. This paper presents the development and the experimental application of two methods to predict the system behavior based on trends in performance. Statistical regression concepts have been used to analyze dynamic plant signals, and based on these results, future plant operation was estimated. Wavelet transforms were used to condition the signal, and the denoised signals were subsequently forecast. The case study presented here applies the two methodologies to the operational data from a simple cycle 85MW General Electric gas turbine. Those operating data were used to train and validate the algorithms. A comparison of the two methodologies reveals that the wavelet forecast is better than the statistical strategy with lower forecasting error. The developed approaches may be used in parallel with a diagnostic algorithm to monitor gas turbine system behavior.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Comparison of Two Trending Strategies for Gas Turbine Performance Prediction
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2898838
    journal fristpage41601
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsGas turbines
    keywordsSignals
    keywordsWavelets
    keywordsTurbines
    keywordsErrors AND Industrial plants
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian