System Study on Partial Gasification Combined Cycle With CO2 RecoverySource: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 005::page 51801DOI: 10.1115/1.2938273Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: A partial gasification combined cycle with CO2 recovery is proposed in this paper. Partial gasification adopts cascade conversion of the composition of coal. Active composition of coal is simply gasified, while inactive composition, that is char, is burnt in a boiler. Oxy-fuel combustion of syngas produces only CO2 and H2O, so the CO2 can be separated through cooling the working fluid. This decreases the amount of energy consumption to separate CO2 compared with conventional methods. The novel system integrates the above two key technologies by injecting steam from a steam turbine into the combustion chamber of a gas turbine to combine the Rankine cycle with the Brayton cycle. The thermal efficiency of this system will be higher based on the cascade utilization of energy level. Compared with the conventional integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), the compressor of the gas turbine, heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) and gasifier are substituted for a pump, reheater, and partial gasifier, so the system is simplified obviously. Furthermore, the novel system is investigated by means of energy-utilization diagram methodology and provides a simple analysis of their economic and environmental performance. As a result, the thermal efficiency of this system may be expected to be 45%, with CO2 recovery of 41.2%, which is 1.5–3.5% higher than that of an IGCC system. At the same time, the total investment cost of the new system is about 16% lower than that of an IGCC. The comparison between the partial gasification technology and the IGCC technology is based on the two representative cases to identify the specific feature of the proposed system. The promising results obtained here with higher thermal efficiency, lower cost, and less environmental impact provide an attractive option for clean-coal utilization technology.
keyword(s): Temperature , Combustion , Combustion chambers , Boilers , Coal , Syngas , Cycles , Fuel gasification , Steam , Integrated gasification combined cycle , Gas turbines , Exergy , Compressors , Pressure , Oxygen AND Pumps ,
|
Show full item record
contributor author | Yujie Xu | |
contributor author | Hongguang Jin | |
contributor author | Rumou Lin | |
contributor author | Wei Han | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:27:49Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T00:27:49Z | |
date copyright | September, 2008 | |
date issued | 2008 | |
identifier issn | 1528-8919 | |
identifier other | JETPEZ-27035#051801_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/137871 | |
description abstract | A partial gasification combined cycle with CO2 recovery is proposed in this paper. Partial gasification adopts cascade conversion of the composition of coal. Active composition of coal is simply gasified, while inactive composition, that is char, is burnt in a boiler. Oxy-fuel combustion of syngas produces only CO2 and H2O, so the CO2 can be separated through cooling the working fluid. This decreases the amount of energy consumption to separate CO2 compared with conventional methods. The novel system integrates the above two key technologies by injecting steam from a steam turbine into the combustion chamber of a gas turbine to combine the Rankine cycle with the Brayton cycle. The thermal efficiency of this system will be higher based on the cascade utilization of energy level. Compared with the conventional integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), the compressor of the gas turbine, heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) and gasifier are substituted for a pump, reheater, and partial gasifier, so the system is simplified obviously. Furthermore, the novel system is investigated by means of energy-utilization diagram methodology and provides a simple analysis of their economic and environmental performance. As a result, the thermal efficiency of this system may be expected to be 45%, with CO2 recovery of 41.2%, which is 1.5–3.5% higher than that of an IGCC system. At the same time, the total investment cost of the new system is about 16% lower than that of an IGCC. The comparison between the partial gasification technology and the IGCC technology is based on the two representative cases to identify the specific feature of the proposed system. The promising results obtained here with higher thermal efficiency, lower cost, and less environmental impact provide an attractive option for clean-coal utilization technology. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | System Study on Partial Gasification Combined Cycle With CO2 Recovery | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 130 | |
journal issue | 5 | |
journal title | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2938273 | |
journal fristpage | 51801 | |
identifier eissn | 0742-4795 | |
keywords | Temperature | |
keywords | Combustion | |
keywords | Combustion chambers | |
keywords | Boilers | |
keywords | Coal | |
keywords | Syngas | |
keywords | Cycles | |
keywords | Fuel gasification | |
keywords | Steam | |
keywords | Integrated gasification combined cycle | |
keywords | Gas turbines | |
keywords | Exergy | |
keywords | Compressors | |
keywords | Pressure | |
keywords | Oxygen AND Pumps | |
tree | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 005 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |