YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparative Study of Two Low CO2 Emission Power Generation System Options With Natural Gas Reforming

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 005::page 51701
    Author:
    Na Zhang
    ,
    Noam Lior
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2904895
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Two power plant schemes that reduce CO2 emission and employ natural gas reforming were analyzed and discussed. The first one integrates natural gas reforming technology for efficiency improvement with an oxy-fuel combined power system (OXYF-REF), with water as the main work fluid. The reforming heat is obtained from the available turbine exhaust heat, and the produced syngas is used as fuel with oxygen as the oxidizer. The turbine working fluid can expand down to a vacuum, producing a high-pressure ratio and thus more net work. The second system integrates natural gas reforming in a precombustion decarbonization scheme using chemical absorption technology for the CO2 removal (PCD-REF). The gas turbine is the conventional air-based one with compressor intercooling. Supplementary combustion is employed to elevate the turbine exhaust temperature and thus achieve a much higher methane conversion rate (96.9%). Both systems involve internal heat recuperation from gas turbine exhausts, and particular attention has been paid to the integration of the heat recovery chain to reduce the related exergy destruction. The systems are simulated and their thermal efficiency, overall and component exergy losses, and CO2 removal capacity are compared. The OXYF-REF system has a higher energy efficiency, of 51.4%, and higher CO2 removal, but the product CO2 has lower purity, of 84%. The PCD-REF system has a thermal efficiency of 46%, the captured CO2 is 99% pure, and the CO2 specific emission is 58.5g∕kWh.
    keyword(s): Heat , Temperature , Combustion , Fuels , Compressors , Exergy , Energy generation , Natural gas , Turbines , Electric power generation , Exhaust systems , Steam , Emissions , Methane , Absorption , Compression , Pressure , Fluids , Gas turbines , Combustion chambers , Syngas , Water , Cycles , Heat recovery , Oxygen , Energy / power systems AND Energy efficiency ,
    • Download: (384.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparative Study of Two Low CO2 Emission Power Generation System Options With Natural Gas Reforming

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/137870
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNa Zhang
    contributor authorNoam Lior
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:27:49Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:27:49Z
    date copyrightSeptember, 2008
    date issued2008
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-27035#051701_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/137870
    description abstractTwo power plant schemes that reduce CO2 emission and employ natural gas reforming were analyzed and discussed. The first one integrates natural gas reforming technology for efficiency improvement with an oxy-fuel combined power system (OXYF-REF), with water as the main work fluid. The reforming heat is obtained from the available turbine exhaust heat, and the produced syngas is used as fuel with oxygen as the oxidizer. The turbine working fluid can expand down to a vacuum, producing a high-pressure ratio and thus more net work. The second system integrates natural gas reforming in a precombustion decarbonization scheme using chemical absorption technology for the CO2 removal (PCD-REF). The gas turbine is the conventional air-based one with compressor intercooling. Supplementary combustion is employed to elevate the turbine exhaust temperature and thus achieve a much higher methane conversion rate (96.9%). Both systems involve internal heat recuperation from gas turbine exhausts, and particular attention has been paid to the integration of the heat recovery chain to reduce the related exergy destruction. The systems are simulated and their thermal efficiency, overall and component exergy losses, and CO2 removal capacity are compared. The OXYF-REF system has a higher energy efficiency, of 51.4%, and higher CO2 removal, but the product CO2 has lower purity, of 84%. The PCD-REF system has a thermal efficiency of 46%, the captured CO2 is 99% pure, and the CO2 specific emission is 58.5g∕kWh.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparative Study of Two Low CO2 Emission Power Generation System Options With Natural Gas Reforming
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2904895
    journal fristpage51701
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsHeat
    keywordsTemperature
    keywordsCombustion
    keywordsFuels
    keywordsCompressors
    keywordsExergy
    keywordsEnergy generation
    keywordsNatural gas
    keywordsTurbines
    keywordsElectric power generation
    keywordsExhaust systems
    keywordsSteam
    keywordsEmissions
    keywordsMethane
    keywordsAbsorption
    keywordsCompression
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsFluids
    keywordsGas turbines
    keywordsCombustion chambers
    keywordsSyngas
    keywordsWater
    keywordsCycles
    keywordsHeat recovery
    keywordsOxygen
    keywordsEnergy / power systems AND Energy efficiency
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian