YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Pressure-Scaling of Pressure-Swirl Atomizer Cone Angles

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 006::page 61501
    Author:
    D. R. Guildenbecher
    ,
    R. R. Rachedi
    ,
    P. E. Sojka
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2939004
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: An experimental investigation was conducted to study the effects of increased ambient pressure (up to 6.89MPa) and increased nozzle pressure drop (up to 2.8MPa) on the cone angles for sprays produced by pressure-swirl atomizers having varying amounts of initial swirl. This study extends the classical results of and , (1957, “ Effect of Ambient and Fuel Pressure on Nozzle Spray Angle,” ASME Transactions, 79(3), pp. 607–615). Shadow photography was used to measure cone angles at x∕D0=10, 20, 40, and 60. Our lower pressure results for atomizer swirl numbers of 0.50 and 0.25 are consistent with those of DeCorso and Kemeny, who observed a decrease in cone angle with an increase in nozzle pressure drop, ΔP, and ambient density, ρair, until a minimum cone angle was reached when ΔPρair1.6∼100MPa(kg∕m3)1.6 (equivalent to 200psi(lbm∕ft3)1.6). Results for atomizers having higher initial swirl do not match the DeCorso and Kemeny results as well, suggesting that their correlation be used with caution. Another key finding is that an increase in ΔPρair1.6 to a value of 600MPa(kg∕m3)1.6 leads to continued decrease in cone angle, but that a subsequent increase to 2000MPa(kg∕m3)1.6 has little effect on cone angle. Finally, there was little effect of nozzle pressure drop on cone angle, in contrast to findings of previous workers. These effects are hypothesized to be due to gas entrainment.
    keyword(s): Pressure , Nozzles , Sprays AND Pressure drop ,
    • Download: (372.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Pressure-Scaling of Pressure-Swirl Atomizer Cone Angles

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/137839
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorD. R. Guildenbecher
    contributor authorR. R. Rachedi
    contributor authorP. E. Sojka
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:27:45Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:27:45Z
    date copyrightNovember, 2008
    date issued2008
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-27043#061501_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/137839
    description abstractAn experimental investigation was conducted to study the effects of increased ambient pressure (up to 6.89MPa) and increased nozzle pressure drop (up to 2.8MPa) on the cone angles for sprays produced by pressure-swirl atomizers having varying amounts of initial swirl. This study extends the classical results of and , (1957, “ Effect of Ambient and Fuel Pressure on Nozzle Spray Angle,” ASME Transactions, 79(3), pp. 607–615). Shadow photography was used to measure cone angles at x∕D0=10, 20, 40, and 60. Our lower pressure results for atomizer swirl numbers of 0.50 and 0.25 are consistent with those of DeCorso and Kemeny, who observed a decrease in cone angle with an increase in nozzle pressure drop, ΔP, and ambient density, ρair, until a minimum cone angle was reached when ΔPρair1.6∼100MPa(kg∕m3)1.6 (equivalent to 200psi(lbm∕ft3)1.6). Results for atomizers having higher initial swirl do not match the DeCorso and Kemeny results as well, suggesting that their correlation be used with caution. Another key finding is that an increase in ΔPρair1.6 to a value of 600MPa(kg∕m3)1.6 leads to continued decrease in cone angle, but that a subsequent increase to 2000MPa(kg∕m3)1.6 has little effect on cone angle. Finally, there was little effect of nozzle pressure drop on cone angle, in contrast to findings of previous workers. These effects are hypothesized to be due to gas entrainment.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titlePressure-Scaling of Pressure-Swirl Atomizer Cone Angles
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2939004
    journal fristpage61501
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsNozzles
    keywordsSprays AND Pressure drop
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian