YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Microcontact Non-Gaussian Surface Roughness Model Accounting for Elastic Recovery

    Source: Journal of Applied Mechanics:;2008:;volume( 075 ):;issue: 003::page 31015
    Author:
    Jeng Luen Liou
    ,
    Jen Fin Lin
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2840043
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Most statistical contact analyses assume that asperity height distributions (g(z*)) follow a Gaussian distribution. However, engineered surfaces are frequently non-Gaussian with the type dependent on the material and surface state being evaluated. When two rough surfaces experience contact deformations, the original topography of the surfaces varies with different loads, and the deformed topography of the surfaces after unloading and elastic recovery is quite different from surface contacts under a constant load. A theoretical method is proposed in the present study to discuss the variations of the topography of the surfaces for two contact conditions. The first kind of topography is obtained during the contact of two surfaces under a normal load. The second kind of topography is obtained from a rough contact surface after elastic recovery. The profile of the probability density function is quite sharp and has a large peak value if it is obtained from the surface contacts under a normal load. The profile of the probability density function defined for the contact surface after elastic recovery is quite close to the profile before experiencing contact deformations if the plasticity index is a small value. However, the probability density function for the contact surface after elastic recovery is closer to that shown in the contacts under a normal load if a large initial plasticity index is assumed. How skewness (Sk) and kurtosis (Kt), which are the parameters in the probability density function, are affected by a change in the dimensionless contact load, the initial skewness (the initial kurtosis is fixed in this study) or the initial plasticity index of the rough surface is also discussed on the basis of the topography models mentioned above. The behavior of the contact parameters exhibited in the model of the invariant probability density function is different from the behavior exhibited in the present model.
    keyword(s): Density , Plasticity , Deformation , Separation (Technology) , Surface roughness , Stress AND Probability ,
    • Download: (261.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Microcontact Non-Gaussian Surface Roughness Model Accounting for Elastic Recovery

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/137307
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJeng Luen Liou
    contributor authorJen Fin Lin
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:26:42Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:26:42Z
    date copyrightMay, 2008
    date issued2008
    identifier issn0021-8936
    identifier otherJAMCAV-26693#031015_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/137307
    description abstractMost statistical contact analyses assume that asperity height distributions (g(z*)) follow a Gaussian distribution. However, engineered surfaces are frequently non-Gaussian with the type dependent on the material and surface state being evaluated. When two rough surfaces experience contact deformations, the original topography of the surfaces varies with different loads, and the deformed topography of the surfaces after unloading and elastic recovery is quite different from surface contacts under a constant load. A theoretical method is proposed in the present study to discuss the variations of the topography of the surfaces for two contact conditions. The first kind of topography is obtained during the contact of two surfaces under a normal load. The second kind of topography is obtained from a rough contact surface after elastic recovery. The profile of the probability density function is quite sharp and has a large peak value if it is obtained from the surface contacts under a normal load. The profile of the probability density function defined for the contact surface after elastic recovery is quite close to the profile before experiencing contact deformations if the plasticity index is a small value. However, the probability density function for the contact surface after elastic recovery is closer to that shown in the contacts under a normal load if a large initial plasticity index is assumed. How skewness (Sk) and kurtosis (Kt), which are the parameters in the probability density function, are affected by a change in the dimensionless contact load, the initial skewness (the initial kurtosis is fixed in this study) or the initial plasticity index of the rough surface is also discussed on the basis of the topography models mentioned above. The behavior of the contact parameters exhibited in the model of the invariant probability density function is different from the behavior exhibited in the present model.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Microcontact Non-Gaussian Surface Roughness Model Accounting for Elastic Recovery
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume75
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Applied Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2840043
    journal fristpage31015
    identifier eissn1528-9036
    keywordsDensity
    keywordsPlasticity
    keywordsDeformation
    keywordsSeparation (Technology)
    keywordsSurface roughness
    keywordsStress AND Probability
    treeJournal of Applied Mechanics:;2008:;volume( 075 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian