YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of Single and Multiphase Jets in a Crossflow Using Large Eddy Simulations

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2007:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 001::page 61
    Author:
    Mirko Salewski
    ,
    Dragan Stankovic
    ,
    Laszlo Fuchs
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2180810
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Large eddy simulations (LES) are performed for single and multiphase jets in crossflow (JICF). The multiphase JICF are compared to the single-phase case for the same momentum and mass flow ratios but with droplets of different sizes. Multiphase JICF have stronger counterrotating vortex pairs (CVPs) than a corresponding single-phase JICF. Moreover, their trajectories are higher and their induced wakes weaker. The smaller the Stokes number of the droplets, the more the solution approaches the solution for single-phase flow. The computed results show the formation of a CVP and horseshoe vortices, which are convected downstream. LES also reveals the intermittent formation of upright wake vortices from the horseshoe vortices on the ground toward the CVP. The dispersion of polydisperse spray droplets is computed using the stochastic parcel method. Atomization and droplet breakup are modeled by a combination of the breakup model by Reitz and the Taylor analogy breakup model (see , , and , 2000, Flow, Turbul. Combust., 65(2), pp. 223–244). Evaporation and droplet collision are also modeled. The flow solver uses two-way coupling. Averages of the velocity and gaseous fuel mass fraction are computed. The single-phase JICF is validated against experimental data obtained by PIV. Additionally, the PDFs and frequency spectra are presented.
    keyword(s): Momentum , Flow (Dynamics) , Multiphase flow , Jets , Evaporation , Large eddy simulation , Vortices , Nozzles , Spectra (Spectroscopy) , Collisions (Physics) , Mixtures , Fuels , Wake turbulence , Wakes AND Sprays ,
    • Download: (263.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of Single and Multiphase Jets in a Crossflow Using Large Eddy Simulations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/135771
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMirko Salewski
    contributor authorDragan Stankovic
    contributor authorLaszlo Fuchs
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:23:48Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:23:48Z
    date copyrightJanuary, 2007
    date issued2007
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-26935#61_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/135771
    description abstractLarge eddy simulations (LES) are performed for single and multiphase jets in crossflow (JICF). The multiphase JICF are compared to the single-phase case for the same momentum and mass flow ratios but with droplets of different sizes. Multiphase JICF have stronger counterrotating vortex pairs (CVPs) than a corresponding single-phase JICF. Moreover, their trajectories are higher and their induced wakes weaker. The smaller the Stokes number of the droplets, the more the solution approaches the solution for single-phase flow. The computed results show the formation of a CVP and horseshoe vortices, which are convected downstream. LES also reveals the intermittent formation of upright wake vortices from the horseshoe vortices on the ground toward the CVP. The dispersion of polydisperse spray droplets is computed using the stochastic parcel method. Atomization and droplet breakup are modeled by a combination of the breakup model by Reitz and the Taylor analogy breakup model (see , , and , 2000, Flow, Turbul. Combust., 65(2), pp. 223–244). Evaporation and droplet collision are also modeled. The flow solver uses two-way coupling. Averages of the velocity and gaseous fuel mass fraction are computed. The single-phase JICF is validated against experimental data obtained by PIV. Additionally, the PDFs and frequency spectra are presented.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Comparison of Single and Multiphase Jets in a Crossflow Using Large Eddy Simulations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume129
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2180810
    journal fristpage61
    journal lastpage68
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsMomentum
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsMultiphase flow
    keywordsJets
    keywordsEvaporation
    keywordsLarge eddy simulation
    keywordsVortices
    keywordsNozzles
    keywordsSpectra (Spectroscopy)
    keywordsCollisions (Physics)
    keywordsMixtures
    keywordsFuels
    keywordsWake turbulence
    keywordsWakes AND Sprays
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2007:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian