Comparison of Cervical Disk Implants and Cervical Disk Fusion Treatments in Human Cadaveric ModelsSource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2006:;volume( 128 ):;issue: 004::page 481Author:D. B. Murrey
,
M. A. Davies
,
S. C. Bryant
,
D. S. Nussman
,
E. B. Laxer
,
S. P. Larsen
,
B. V. Darden
DOI: 10.1115/1.2205373Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Articulating cervical disk implants have been proposed as an alternative to disk fusion in the treatment of cervical disk disease. To examine the mechanical effect of articulating cervical disk implants (ACDI) versus simulated cervical disk fusion, a mechanical test device was constructed and cadaveric tests were carried out. While results show little effect on the pressures above and below the treatment level, the percent hysteretic behavior of the specimens trended to be higher for the ACDI, indicating that these implants retain more of the natural energy absorption capability of the cervical spine.
keyword(s): Absorption , Stress , Disks , Kinematics , Motion , Cervical spine AND Pressure ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | D. B. Murrey | |
| contributor author | M. A. Davies | |
| contributor author | S. C. Bryant | |
| contributor author | D. S. Nussman | |
| contributor author | E. B. Laxer | |
| contributor author | S. P. Larsen | |
| contributor author | B. V. Darden | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:18:52Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:18:52Z | |
| date copyright | August, 2006 | |
| date issued | 2006 | |
| identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
| identifier other | JBENDY-26601#481_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/133170 | |
| description abstract | Articulating cervical disk implants have been proposed as an alternative to disk fusion in the treatment of cervical disk disease. To examine the mechanical effect of articulating cervical disk implants (ACDI) versus simulated cervical disk fusion, a mechanical test device was constructed and cadaveric tests were carried out. While results show little effect on the pressures above and below the treatment level, the percent hysteretic behavior of the specimens trended to be higher for the ACDI, indicating that these implants retain more of the natural energy absorption capability of the cervical spine. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Comparison of Cervical Disk Implants and Cervical Disk Fusion Treatments in Human Cadaveric Models | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 128 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2205373 | |
| journal fristpage | 481 | |
| journal lastpage | 486 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8951 | |
| keywords | Absorption | |
| keywords | Stress | |
| keywords | Disks | |
| keywords | Kinematics | |
| keywords | Motion | |
| keywords | Cervical spine AND Pressure | |
| tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2006:;volume( 128 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |