Show simple item record

contributor authorD. B. Murrey
contributor authorM. A. Davies
contributor authorS. C. Bryant
contributor authorD. S. Nussman
contributor authorE. B. Laxer
contributor authorS. P. Larsen
contributor authorB. V. Darden
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:18:52Z
date available2017-05-09T00:18:52Z
date copyrightAugust, 2006
date issued2006
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherJBENDY-26601#481_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/133170
description abstractArticulating cervical disk implants have been proposed as an alternative to disk fusion in the treatment of cervical disk disease. To examine the mechanical effect of articulating cervical disk implants (ACDI) versus simulated cervical disk fusion, a mechanical test device was constructed and cadaveric tests were carried out. While results show little effect on the pressures above and below the treatment level, the percent hysteretic behavior of the specimens trended to be higher for the ACDI, indicating that these implants retain more of the natural energy absorption capability of the cervical spine.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison of Cervical Disk Implants and Cervical Disk Fusion Treatments in Human Cadaveric Models
typeJournal Paper
journal volume128
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.2205373
journal fristpage481
journal lastpage486
identifier eissn1528-8951
keywordsAbsorption
keywordsStress
keywordsDisks
keywordsKinematics
keywordsMotion
keywordsCervical spine AND Pressure
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2006:;volume( 128 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record