YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Design of a Mechanical Damage Inspection Tool Using Dual Field Magnetic Flux Leakage Technology

    Source: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2005:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 003::page 274
    Author:
    J. Bruce Nestleroth
    ,
    Richard J. Davis
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1989349
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper describes the design of a new magnetic flux leakage (MFL) inspection tool that performs an inline inspection to detect and characterize both metal loss and mechanical damage defects. An inspection tool that couples mechanical damage assessment as part of a routine corrosion inspection is expected to have considerably better prospects for application in the pipeline industry than a tool that complicates existing procedures. The design is based on study results that show it is feasible to detect and assess mechanical damage by applying a low magnetic field level in addition to the high magnetic field employed by most inspection tools. Nearly all commercially available MFL tools use high magnetic fields to detect and size metal loss such as corrosion. A lower field than is commonly applied for detecting metal loss is appropriate for detecting mechanical damage, such as the metallurgical changes caused by impacts from excavation equipment. The lower field is needed to counter the saturation effect of the high magnetic field, which masks and diminishes important components of the signal associated with mechanical damage. Finite element modeling was used in the design effort and the results have shown that a single magnetizer with three poles is the most effective design. Furthermore, it was found that for the three-pole system the high magnetization pole must be in the center, which was an unexpected result. The three-pole design has mechanical advantages, including a magnetic null in the backing bar, which enables installation of a pivot point for articulation of the tool through bends and restrictions. This design was prototyped and tested at Battelle’s Pipeline Simulation Facility (West Jefferson, OH). The signals were nearly identical to results acquired with a single magnetizer reconfigured between tests to attain the appropriate high and low field levels.
    keyword(s): Magnetic fields , Magnetic flux , Poles (Building) , Magnetization , Design , Inspection , Pipelines , Pipes , Leakage , Equipment and tools , Magnets , Modeling AND Signals ,
    • Download: (2.028Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Design of a Mechanical Damage Inspection Tool Using Dual Field Magnetic Flux Leakage Technology

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/132499
    Collections
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJ. Bruce Nestleroth
    contributor authorRichard J. Davis
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:17:35Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:17:35Z
    date copyrightAugust, 2005
    date issued2005
    identifier issn0094-9930
    identifier otherJPVTAS-28457#274_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/132499
    description abstractThis paper describes the design of a new magnetic flux leakage (MFL) inspection tool that performs an inline inspection to detect and characterize both metal loss and mechanical damage defects. An inspection tool that couples mechanical damage assessment as part of a routine corrosion inspection is expected to have considerably better prospects for application in the pipeline industry than a tool that complicates existing procedures. The design is based on study results that show it is feasible to detect and assess mechanical damage by applying a low magnetic field level in addition to the high magnetic field employed by most inspection tools. Nearly all commercially available MFL tools use high magnetic fields to detect and size metal loss such as corrosion. A lower field than is commonly applied for detecting metal loss is appropriate for detecting mechanical damage, such as the metallurgical changes caused by impacts from excavation equipment. The lower field is needed to counter the saturation effect of the high magnetic field, which masks and diminishes important components of the signal associated with mechanical damage. Finite element modeling was used in the design effort and the results have shown that a single magnetizer with three poles is the most effective design. Furthermore, it was found that for the three-pole system the high magnetization pole must be in the center, which was an unexpected result. The three-pole design has mechanical advantages, including a magnetic null in the backing bar, which enables installation of a pivot point for articulation of the tool through bends and restrictions. This design was prototyped and tested at Battelle’s Pipeline Simulation Facility (West Jefferson, OH). The signals were nearly identical to results acquired with a single magnetizer reconfigured between tests to attain the appropriate high and low field levels.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThe Design of a Mechanical Damage Inspection Tool Using Dual Field Magnetic Flux Leakage Technology
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume127
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1989349
    journal fristpage274
    journal lastpage283
    identifier eissn1528-8978
    keywordsMagnetic fields
    keywordsMagnetic flux
    keywordsPoles (Building)
    keywordsMagnetization
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsInspection
    keywordsPipelines
    keywordsPipes
    keywordsLeakage
    keywordsEquipment and tools
    keywordsMagnets
    keywordsModeling AND Signals
    treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2005:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian