Show simple item record

contributor authorJ. Bruce Nestleroth
contributor authorRichard J. Davis
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:17:35Z
date available2017-05-09T00:17:35Z
date copyrightAugust, 2005
date issued2005
identifier issn0094-9930
identifier otherJPVTAS-28457#274_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/132499
description abstractThis paper describes the design of a new magnetic flux leakage (MFL) inspection tool that performs an inline inspection to detect and characterize both metal loss and mechanical damage defects. An inspection tool that couples mechanical damage assessment as part of a routine corrosion inspection is expected to have considerably better prospects for application in the pipeline industry than a tool that complicates existing procedures. The design is based on study results that show it is feasible to detect and assess mechanical damage by applying a low magnetic field level in addition to the high magnetic field employed by most inspection tools. Nearly all commercially available MFL tools use high magnetic fields to detect and size metal loss such as corrosion. A lower field than is commonly applied for detecting metal loss is appropriate for detecting mechanical damage, such as the metallurgical changes caused by impacts from excavation equipment. The lower field is needed to counter the saturation effect of the high magnetic field, which masks and diminishes important components of the signal associated with mechanical damage. Finite element modeling was used in the design effort and the results have shown that a single magnetizer with three poles is the most effective design. Furthermore, it was found that for the three-pole system the high magnetization pole must be in the center, which was an unexpected result. The three-pole design has mechanical advantages, including a magnetic null in the backing bar, which enables installation of a pivot point for articulation of the tool through bends and restrictions. This design was prototyped and tested at Battelle’s Pipeline Simulation Facility (West Jefferson, OH). The signals were nearly identical to results acquired with a single magnetizer reconfigured between tests to attain the appropriate high and low field levels.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleThe Design of a Mechanical Damage Inspection Tool Using Dual Field Magnetic Flux Leakage Technology
typeJournal Paper
journal volume127
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.1989349
journal fristpage274
journal lastpage283
identifier eissn1528-8978
keywordsMagnetic fields
keywordsMagnetic flux
keywordsPoles (Building)
keywordsMagnetization
keywordsDesign
keywordsInspection
keywordsPipelines
keywordsPipes
keywordsLeakage
keywordsEquipment and tools
keywordsMagnets
keywordsModeling AND Signals
treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2005:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record