Response to Dr. Robert W. MannSource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 004::page 539Author:Gerard A. Ateshian
DOI: 10.1115/1.1785815Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Dr. Mann’s assertion that experimentally-based results trump those of theory is only as convincing as the validity of the results. As Dr. Mann himself acknowledges in his comment, the analysis of the fluid flow in his study was based on a finite element model, not on direct experimental measurements 1. Only the boundary conditions used for the finite element analysis were based on experimental data. Therefore, their conclusion supporting the weeping mechanism is only as good as their finite element modeling assumptions, which have a major limitation.
keyword(s): Fluid dynamics , Finite element analysis , Mechanisms , Displacement , Finite element model , Gradients , Cartilage , Modeling , Boundary-value problems , Momentum , Fluid pressure , Flow (Dynamics) , Fluids , Measurement , Darcy's law AND Bone ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Gerard A. Ateshian | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:12:17Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T00:12:17Z | |
date copyright | August, 2004 | |
date issued | 2004 | |
identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
identifier other | JBENDY-26372#539_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/129584 | |
description abstract | Dr. Mann’s assertion that experimentally-based results trump those of theory is only as convincing as the validity of the results. As Dr. Mann himself acknowledges in his comment, the analysis of the fluid flow in his study was based on a finite element model, not on direct experimental measurements 1. Only the boundary conditions used for the finite element analysis were based on experimental data. Therefore, their conclusion supporting the weeping mechanism is only as good as their finite element modeling assumptions, which have a major limitation. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Response to Dr. Robert W. Mann | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 126 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1785815 | |
journal fristpage | 539 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8951 | |
keywords | Fluid dynamics | |
keywords | Finite element analysis | |
keywords | Mechanisms | |
keywords | Displacement | |
keywords | Finite element model | |
keywords | Gradients | |
keywords | Cartilage | |
keywords | Modeling | |
keywords | Boundary-value problems | |
keywords | Momentum | |
keywords | Fluid pressure | |
keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
keywords | Fluids | |
keywords | Measurement | |
keywords | Darcy's law AND Bone | |
tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |