YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Response to Dr. Robert W. Mann

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 004::page 539
    Author:
    Gerard A. Ateshian
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1785815
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Dr. Mann’s assertion that experimentally-based results trump those of theory is only as convincing as the validity of the results. As Dr. Mann himself acknowledges in his comment, the analysis of the fluid flow in his study was based on a finite element model, not on direct experimental measurements 1. Only the boundary conditions used for the finite element analysis were based on experimental data. Therefore, their conclusion supporting the weeping mechanism is only as good as their finite element modeling assumptions, which have a major limitation.
    keyword(s): Fluid dynamics , Finite element analysis , Mechanisms , Displacement , Finite element model , Gradients , Cartilage , Modeling , Boundary-value problems , Momentum , Fluid pressure , Flow (Dynamics) , Fluids , Measurement , Darcy's law AND Bone ,
    • Download: (13.18Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Response to Dr. Robert W. Mann

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/129584
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGerard A. Ateshian
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:12:17Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:12:17Z
    date copyrightAugust, 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherJBENDY-26372#539_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/129584
    description abstractDr. Mann’s assertion that experimentally-based results trump those of theory is only as convincing as the validity of the results. As Dr. Mann himself acknowledges in his comment, the analysis of the fluid flow in his study was based on a finite element model, not on direct experimental measurements 1. Only the boundary conditions used for the finite element analysis were based on experimental data. Therefore, their conclusion supporting the weeping mechanism is only as good as their finite element modeling assumptions, which have a major limitation.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleResponse to Dr. Robert W. Mann
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume126
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1785815
    journal fristpage539
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    keywordsFluid dynamics
    keywordsFinite element analysis
    keywordsMechanisms
    keywordsDisplacement
    keywordsFinite element model
    keywordsGradients
    keywordsCartilage
    keywordsModeling
    keywordsBoundary-value problems
    keywordsMomentum
    keywordsFluid pressure
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsFluids
    keywordsMeasurement
    keywordsDarcy's law AND Bone
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian