Show simple item record

contributor authorGerard A. Ateshian
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:12:17Z
date available2017-05-09T00:12:17Z
date copyrightAugust, 2004
date issued2004
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherJBENDY-26372#539_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/129584
description abstractDr. Mann’s assertion that experimentally-based results trump those of theory is only as convincing as the validity of the results. As Dr. Mann himself acknowledges in his comment, the analysis of the fluid flow in his study was based on a finite element model, not on direct experimental measurements 1. Only the boundary conditions used for the finite element analysis were based on experimental data. Therefore, their conclusion supporting the weeping mechanism is only as good as their finite element modeling assumptions, which have a major limitation.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleResponse to Dr. Robert W. Mann
typeJournal Paper
journal volume126
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.1785815
journal fristpage539
identifier eissn1528-8951
keywordsFluid dynamics
keywordsFinite element analysis
keywordsMechanisms
keywordsDisplacement
keywordsFinite element model
keywordsGradients
keywordsCartilage
keywordsModeling
keywordsBoundary-value problems
keywordsMomentum
keywordsFluid pressure
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsFluids
keywordsMeasurement
keywordsDarcy's law AND Bone
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record