Parametric Study of a Simplified Ice Storage Model Operating Under Conventional and Optimal Control Strategies*Source: Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2003:;volume( 125 ):;issue: 001::page 2Author:Gregor P. Henze
DOI: 10.1115/1.1530629Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: A simplified ice storage system model was developed in which the icemaking mode is reflected by a higher power consumption per unit cooling than in chilled-water mode. The performance of four control strategies for ice storage systems is evaluated. The four control strategies investigated are chiller-priority and constant-proportion as conventional, instantaneous controls, while storage-priority and optimal control represent sophisticated controls employing load forecasting. Six parameters were investigated with respect to their influence on the ice storage system performance: Storage losses, utility rate structures, rate periods, penalty for icemaking, storage capacity, and the impact of load forecasting. Optimal control was determined to provide maximal operating cost savings. The storage-priority control yields operating costs only slightly higher than those of optimal control. Chiller-priority control realized savings that were typically on the order of 50% of what is theoretically possible (optimal control). Constant-proportion control proved to be a simple control strategy yielding higher savings than chiller-priority, yet lower than storage-priority control.
keyword(s): Cooling , Stress , Ice , Optimal control AND Storage ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Gregor P. Henze | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:11:25Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T00:11:25Z | |
date copyright | February, 2003 | |
date issued | 2003 | |
identifier issn | 0199-6231 | |
identifier other | JSEEDO-28332#2_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/129077 | |
description abstract | A simplified ice storage system model was developed in which the icemaking mode is reflected by a higher power consumption per unit cooling than in chilled-water mode. The performance of four control strategies for ice storage systems is evaluated. The four control strategies investigated are chiller-priority and constant-proportion as conventional, instantaneous controls, while storage-priority and optimal control represent sophisticated controls employing load forecasting. Six parameters were investigated with respect to their influence on the ice storage system performance: Storage losses, utility rate structures, rate periods, penalty for icemaking, storage capacity, and the impact of load forecasting. Optimal control was determined to provide maximal operating cost savings. The storage-priority control yields operating costs only slightly higher than those of optimal control. Chiller-priority control realized savings that were typically on the order of 50% of what is theoretically possible (optimal control). Constant-proportion control proved to be a simple control strategy yielding higher savings than chiller-priority, yet lower than storage-priority control. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Parametric Study of a Simplified Ice Storage Model Operating Under Conventional and Optimal Control Strategies* | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 125 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Solar Energy Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1530629 | |
journal fristpage | 2 | |
journal lastpage | 12 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8986 | |
keywords | Cooling | |
keywords | Stress | |
keywords | Ice | |
keywords | Optimal control AND Storage | |
tree | Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2003:;volume( 125 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |