YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Shear Buckling of Sandwich, Fiber Composite and Lattice Columns, Bearings, and Helical Springs: Paradox Resolved

    Source: Journal of Applied Mechanics:;2003:;volume( 070 ):;issue: 001::page 75
    Author:
    Z. P. Bažant
    ,
    McCormick School Professor and Walter P. Murphy Professor of Civil Engineering and Materials Science
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1509486
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: As shown three decades ago, in situations where the initial stresses before buckling are not negligible compared to the elastic moduli, the geometrical dependence of the tangential moduli on the initial stresses must be taken into account in stability analysis, and the stability or bifurcation criteria have different forms for tangential moduli associated with different choices of the finite strain measure. So it has appeared paradoxical that, for sandwich columns, different but equally plausible assumptions yield different formulas, Engesser’s and Haringx’ formulas, even though the axial stress in the skins is negligible compared to the axial elastic modulus of the skins and the axial stress in the core is negligible compared to the shear modulus of the core. This apparent paradox is explained by variational energy analysis. It is shown that the shear stiffness of a sandwich column, provided by the core, generally depends on the axial force carried by the skins if that force is not negligible compared to the shear stiffness of the column (if the column is short). The Engesser-type, Haringx-type, and other possible formulas associated with different finite strain measures are all, in principle, equivalent, although a different shear stiffness of the core, depending linearly on the applied axial load, must be used for each. The Haringx-type formula, however, is most convenient because it represents the only case in which the shear modulus of the core can be considered to be independent of the axial force in the skins and to be equal to the shear modulus measured in simple shear tests (e.g., torsional test). Extensions of the analysis further show that Haringx’s formula is preferable for a highly orthotropic composite because a constant shear modulus of the soft matrix can be used for calculating the shear stiffness of the column, and further confirm that Haringx’s buckling formula with a constant shear stiffness is appropriate for helical springs and built-up columns (laced or battened).
    keyword(s): Composite materials , Shear (Mechanics) , Buckling , Formulas , Stiffness , Springs , Force , Bearings , Stress AND Fibers ,
    • Download: (144.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Shear Buckling of Sandwich, Fiber Composite and Lattice Columns, Bearings, and Helical Springs: Paradox Resolved

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/127891
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZ. P. Bažant
    contributor authorMcCormick School Professor and Walter P. Murphy Professor of Civil Engineering and Materials Science
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:09:24Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:09:24Z
    date copyrightJanuary, 2003
    date issued2003
    identifier issn0021-8936
    identifier otherJAMCAV-26549#75_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/127891
    description abstractAs shown three decades ago, in situations where the initial stresses before buckling are not negligible compared to the elastic moduli, the geometrical dependence of the tangential moduli on the initial stresses must be taken into account in stability analysis, and the stability or bifurcation criteria have different forms for tangential moduli associated with different choices of the finite strain measure. So it has appeared paradoxical that, for sandwich columns, different but equally plausible assumptions yield different formulas, Engesser’s and Haringx’ formulas, even though the axial stress in the skins is negligible compared to the axial elastic modulus of the skins and the axial stress in the core is negligible compared to the shear modulus of the core. This apparent paradox is explained by variational energy analysis. It is shown that the shear stiffness of a sandwich column, provided by the core, generally depends on the axial force carried by the skins if that force is not negligible compared to the shear stiffness of the column (if the column is short). The Engesser-type, Haringx-type, and other possible formulas associated with different finite strain measures are all, in principle, equivalent, although a different shear stiffness of the core, depending linearly on the applied axial load, must be used for each. The Haringx-type formula, however, is most convenient because it represents the only case in which the shear modulus of the core can be considered to be independent of the axial force in the skins and to be equal to the shear modulus measured in simple shear tests (e.g., torsional test). Extensions of the analysis further show that Haringx’s formula is preferable for a highly orthotropic composite because a constant shear modulus of the soft matrix can be used for calculating the shear stiffness of the column, and further confirm that Haringx’s buckling formula with a constant shear stiffness is appropriate for helical springs and built-up columns (laced or battened).
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleShear Buckling of Sandwich, Fiber Composite and Lattice Columns, Bearings, and Helical Springs: Paradox Resolved
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume70
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Applied Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1509486
    journal fristpage75
    journal lastpage83
    identifier eissn1528-9036
    keywordsComposite materials
    keywordsShear (Mechanics)
    keywordsBuckling
    keywordsFormulas
    keywordsStiffness
    keywordsSprings
    keywordsForce
    keywordsBearings
    keywordsStress AND Fibers
    treeJournal of Applied Mechanics:;2003:;volume( 070 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian