A Biphasic, Anisotropic Model of the Aortic WallSource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2001:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 001::page 52DOI: 10.1115/1.1339817Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: A biphasic, anisotropic elastic model of the aortic wall is developed and compared to literature values of experimental measurements of vessel wall radii, thickness, and hydraulic conductivity as a function of intraluminal pressure. The model gives good predictions using a constant wall modulus for pressures less than 60 mmHg, but requires a strain-dependent modulus for pressures greater than this. In both bovine and rabbit aorta, the tangential modulus is found to be approximately 20 times greater than the radial modulus. These moduli lead to predictions that, when perfused in a cylindrical geometry, the aortic volume and its specific hydraulic conductivity are relatively independent of perfusion pressure, in agreement with experimental measurements. M, the parameter that relates specific hydraulic conductivity to tissue dilation, is found to be a positive quantity correcting a previous error in the literature.
keyword(s): Pressure , Biological tissues , Conductivity , Geometry , Vessels , Aorta , Thickness AND Errors ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Mark Johnson | |
| contributor author | John M. Tarbell | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:04:16Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:04:16Z | |
| date copyright | February, 2001 | |
| date issued | 2001 | |
| identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
| identifier other | JBENDY-26126#52_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/124848 | |
| description abstract | A biphasic, anisotropic elastic model of the aortic wall is developed and compared to literature values of experimental measurements of vessel wall radii, thickness, and hydraulic conductivity as a function of intraluminal pressure. The model gives good predictions using a constant wall modulus for pressures less than 60 mmHg, but requires a strain-dependent modulus for pressures greater than this. In both bovine and rabbit aorta, the tangential modulus is found to be approximately 20 times greater than the radial modulus. These moduli lead to predictions that, when perfused in a cylindrical geometry, the aortic volume and its specific hydraulic conductivity are relatively independent of perfusion pressure, in agreement with experimental measurements. M, the parameter that relates specific hydraulic conductivity to tissue dilation, is found to be a positive quantity correcting a previous error in the literature. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | A Biphasic, Anisotropic Model of the Aortic Wall | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 123 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1339817 | |
| journal fristpage | 52 | |
| journal lastpage | 57 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8951 | |
| keywords | Pressure | |
| keywords | Biological tissues | |
| keywords | Conductivity | |
| keywords | Geometry | |
| keywords | Vessels | |
| keywords | Aorta | |
| keywords | Thickness AND Errors | |
| tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2001:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |