Show simple item record

contributor authorMark Johnson
contributor authorJohn M. Tarbell
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:04:16Z
date available2017-05-09T00:04:16Z
date copyrightFebruary, 2001
date issued2001
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherJBENDY-26126#52_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/124848
description abstractA biphasic, anisotropic elastic model of the aortic wall is developed and compared to literature values of experimental measurements of vessel wall radii, thickness, and hydraulic conductivity as a function of intraluminal pressure. The model gives good predictions using a constant wall modulus for pressures less than 60 mmHg, but requires a strain-dependent modulus for pressures greater than this. In both bovine and rabbit aorta, the tangential modulus is found to be approximately 20 times greater than the radial modulus. These moduli lead to predictions that, when perfused in a cylindrical geometry, the aortic volume and its specific hydraulic conductivity are relatively independent of perfusion pressure, in agreement with experimental measurements. M, the parameter that relates specific hydraulic conductivity to tissue dilation, is found to be a positive quantity correcting a previous error in the literature.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleA Biphasic, Anisotropic Model of the Aortic Wall
typeJournal Paper
journal volume123
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.1339817
journal fristpage52
journal lastpage57
identifier eissn1528-8951
keywordsPressure
keywordsBiological tissues
keywordsConductivity
keywordsGeometry
keywordsVessels
keywordsAorta
keywordsThickness AND Errors
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2001:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record