YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycles With Low CO2 Emissions

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 003::page 429
    Author:
    Paolo Chiesa
    ,
    Stefano Consonni
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1287496
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper assesses performances and economic viability of CO2 removal by chemical absorption from the flue gases of natural gas-fired Combined Cycles, more specifically for two configurations: one where CO2 is removed ahead of the stack without modifying the power cycle; the other where part of the flue gases is recirculated to the gas turbine, thereby reducing the flow to be treated by chemical absorption. In both cases sequestered CO2 is made available at conditions suitable to storage into deep oceanic waters. Performances and cost of electricity are evaluated for systems based on large, heavy-duty turbines representative of state-of-the-art “FA” technology. Carbon sequestration reduces net plant efficiency and power output by about 10 percent and increases the cost of electricity from 36 to about 50 mills/kWh. Flue gas recirculation warrants slightly higher efficiencies and lower costs. CO2 removal is eventually compared with other strategies for the reduction of CO2 emissions, like switching existing coal-fired steam plants to natural gas or replacing existing steam plants with conventional CCs. At current fuel prices the latter appears the option of choice, with a cost of about $25 per tonn of avoided CO2 emission. [S0742-4795(00)02803-9]
    keyword(s): Natural gas , Cycles , Industrial plants , Emissions , Absorption , Coal , Carbon dioxide , Gas turbines , Carbon capture and storage , Fuels , Carbon AND Steam ,
    • Download: (351.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycles With Low CO2 Emissions

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/123662
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPaolo Chiesa
    contributor authorStefano Consonni
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:02:22Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:02:22Z
    date copyrightJuly, 2000
    date issued2000
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-26797#429_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/123662
    description abstractThis paper assesses performances and economic viability of CO2 removal by chemical absorption from the flue gases of natural gas-fired Combined Cycles, more specifically for two configurations: one where CO2 is removed ahead of the stack without modifying the power cycle; the other where part of the flue gases is recirculated to the gas turbine, thereby reducing the flow to be treated by chemical absorption. In both cases sequestered CO2 is made available at conditions suitable to storage into deep oceanic waters. Performances and cost of electricity are evaluated for systems based on large, heavy-duty turbines representative of state-of-the-art “FA” technology. Carbon sequestration reduces net plant efficiency and power output by about 10 percent and increases the cost of electricity from 36 to about 50 mills/kWh. Flue gas recirculation warrants slightly higher efficiencies and lower costs. CO2 removal is eventually compared with other strategies for the reduction of CO2 emissions, like switching existing coal-fired steam plants to natural gas or replacing existing steam plants with conventional CCs. At current fuel prices the latter appears the option of choice, with a cost of about $25 per tonn of avoided CO2 emission. [S0742-4795(00)02803-9]
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleNatural Gas Fired Combined Cycles With Low CO2 Emissions
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume122
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1287496
    journal fristpage429
    journal lastpage436
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsNatural gas
    keywordsCycles
    keywordsIndustrial plants
    keywordsEmissions
    keywordsAbsorption
    keywordsCoal
    keywordsCarbon dioxide
    keywordsGas turbines
    keywordsCarbon capture and storage
    keywordsFuels
    keywordsCarbon AND Steam
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian