YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    On the Relative Validity of Two Current Cold-Rolling Theories

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1967:;volume( 089 ):;issue: 001::page 69
    Author:
    Iain Le May
    ,
    K. D. Nair
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3609571
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The paper compares the established cold-rolling theory of Ford, et al., with the more recent shear-plane theory. Recent experimental results obtained by the authors are used in the comparison and it is shown that, although the shear-plane theory is inherently more correct as it does not assume homogeneous compression of the strip, the effect of the usual assumption of a yield stress independent of deformation rate virtually negates any advantage in its use at present.
    keyword(s): Deformation , Shear (Mechanics) , Compression , Strips AND Yield stress ,
    • Download: (2.320Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      On the Relative Validity of Two Current Cold-Rolling Theories

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/120513
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorIain Le May
    contributor authorK. D. Nair
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:56:44Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:56:44Z
    date copyrightMarch, 1967
    date issued1967
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27291#69_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/120513
    description abstractThe paper compares the established cold-rolling theory of Ford, et al., with the more recent shear-plane theory. Recent experimental results obtained by the authors are used in the comparison and it is shown that, although the shear-plane theory is inherently more correct as it does not assume homogeneous compression of the strip, the effect of the usual assumption of a yield stress independent of deformation rate virtually negates any advantage in its use at present.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleOn the Relative Validity of Two Current Cold-Rolling Theories
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume89
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3609571
    journal fristpage69
    journal lastpage75
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsDeformation
    keywordsShear (Mechanics)
    keywordsCompression
    keywordsStrips AND Yield stress
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1967:;volume( 089 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian