Show simple item record

contributor authorIain Le May
contributor authorK. D. Nair
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:56:44Z
date available2017-05-08T23:56:44Z
date copyrightMarch, 1967
date issued1967
identifier issn0098-2202
identifier otherJFEGA4-27291#69_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/120513
description abstractThe paper compares the established cold-rolling theory of Ford, et al., with the more recent shear-plane theory. Recent experimental results obtained by the authors are used in the comparison and it is shown that, although the shear-plane theory is inherently more correct as it does not assume homogeneous compression of the strip, the effect of the usual assumption of a yield stress independent of deformation rate virtually negates any advantage in its use at present.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleOn the Relative Validity of Two Current Cold-Rolling Theories
typeJournal Paper
journal volume89
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.3609571
journal fristpage69
journal lastpage75
identifier eissn1528-901X
keywordsDeformation
keywordsShear (Mechanics)
keywordsCompression
keywordsStrips AND Yield stress
treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1967:;volume( 089 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record