contributor author | Chao-Tsung Hsiao | |
contributor author | Laura L. Pauley | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:44:41Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T23:44:41Z | |
date copyright | March, 1994 | |
date issued | 1994 | |
identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
identifier other | JFEGA4-27083#22_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/113860 | |
description abstract | The steady two-dimensional marginal separation of an incompressible boundary layer flow within a channel was solved independently by three different methods: the triple-deck method of marginal separation, the interactive boundary layer method, and the full Navier-Stokes computation. From comparison of the results between these three methods, the accuracy and appropriateness of each method was determined. The critical condition beyond which the steady marginal separation solution of triple-deck method does not exist was related to a physical phenomenon in which the separation bubble becomes unsteady. Factors such as Reynolds number and pressure gradient distribution which might influence the accuracy of the marginal separation solution were also investigated. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Comparison of the Triple-Deck Theory, Interactive Boundary Layer Method, and Navier-Stokes Computation for Marginal Separation | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 116 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2910235 | |
journal fristpage | 22 | |
journal lastpage | 28 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
keywords | Separation (Technology) | |
keywords | Boundary layers | |
keywords | Computation | |
keywords | Pressure gradient | |
keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
keywords | Channels (Hydraulic engineering) | |
keywords | Reynolds number AND Bubbles | |
tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1994:;volume( 116 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |