YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of the Triple-Deck Theory, Interactive Boundary Layer Method, and Navier-Stokes Computation for Marginal Separation

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1994:;volume( 116 ):;issue: 001::page 22
    Author:
    Chao-Tsung Hsiao
    ,
    Laura L. Pauley
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2910235
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The steady two-dimensional marginal separation of an incompressible boundary layer flow within a channel was solved independently by three different methods: the triple-deck method of marginal separation, the interactive boundary layer method, and the full Navier-Stokes computation. From comparison of the results between these three methods, the accuracy and appropriateness of each method was determined. The critical condition beyond which the steady marginal separation solution of triple-deck method does not exist was related to a physical phenomenon in which the separation bubble becomes unsteady. Factors such as Reynolds number and pressure gradient distribution which might influence the accuracy of the marginal separation solution were also investigated.
    keyword(s): Separation (Technology) , Boundary layers , Computation , Pressure gradient , Flow (Dynamics) , Channels (Hydraulic engineering) , Reynolds number AND Bubbles ,
    • Download: (791.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of the Triple-Deck Theory, Interactive Boundary Layer Method, and Navier-Stokes Computation for Marginal Separation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/113860
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorChao-Tsung Hsiao
    contributor authorLaura L. Pauley
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:44:41Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:44:41Z
    date copyrightMarch, 1994
    date issued1994
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27083#22_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/113860
    description abstractThe steady two-dimensional marginal separation of an incompressible boundary layer flow within a channel was solved independently by three different methods: the triple-deck method of marginal separation, the interactive boundary layer method, and the full Navier-Stokes computation. From comparison of the results between these three methods, the accuracy and appropriateness of each method was determined. The critical condition beyond which the steady marginal separation solution of triple-deck method does not exist was related to a physical phenomenon in which the separation bubble becomes unsteady. Factors such as Reynolds number and pressure gradient distribution which might influence the accuracy of the marginal separation solution were also investigated.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparison of the Triple-Deck Theory, Interactive Boundary Layer Method, and Navier-Stokes Computation for Marginal Separation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume116
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2910235
    journal fristpage22
    journal lastpage28
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsSeparation (Technology)
    keywordsBoundary layers
    keywordsComputation
    keywordsPressure gradient
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsChannels (Hydraulic engineering)
    keywordsReynolds number AND Bubbles
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1994:;volume( 116 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian