Show simple item record

contributor authorChao-Tsung Hsiao
contributor authorLaura L. Pauley
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:44:41Z
date available2017-05-08T23:44:41Z
date copyrightMarch, 1994
date issued1994
identifier issn0098-2202
identifier otherJFEGA4-27083#22_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/113860
description abstractThe steady two-dimensional marginal separation of an incompressible boundary layer flow within a channel was solved independently by three different methods: the triple-deck method of marginal separation, the interactive boundary layer method, and the full Navier-Stokes computation. From comparison of the results between these three methods, the accuracy and appropriateness of each method was determined. The critical condition beyond which the steady marginal separation solution of triple-deck method does not exist was related to a physical phenomenon in which the separation bubble becomes unsteady. Factors such as Reynolds number and pressure gradient distribution which might influence the accuracy of the marginal separation solution were also investigated.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison of the Triple-Deck Theory, Interactive Boundary Layer Method, and Navier-Stokes Computation for Marginal Separation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume116
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.2910235
journal fristpage22
journal lastpage28
identifier eissn1528-901X
keywordsSeparation (Technology)
keywordsBoundary layers
keywordsComputation
keywordsPressure gradient
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsChannels (Hydraulic engineering)
keywordsReynolds number AND Bubbles
treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1994:;volume( 116 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record