YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Multiaxial Relaxation and Creep Damage Assessments—A Comparison of ASME N-47 and GLOSS Time-Scaling Methods

    Source: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1993:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 001::page 32
    Author:
    R. Seshadri
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2929492
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Two simplified methods for determining multiaxial relaxation and creep damage, the GLOSS time-scaling and the ASME Code Case N-47 method, are described in this paper. The theoretical basis and applicability of the methods to various pressure component configurations are discussed in detail. The G -factor in the ASME formula in effect speeds up or slows down the uniaxial relaxation process, similar to the GLOSS time-scaling method. The two methods are compared, and the differences are attributed to local follow-up not being accounted for in the ASME formula.
    keyword(s): Creep , Relaxation (Physics) , Formulas , ASME Standards AND Pressure ,
    • Download: (503.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Multiaxial Relaxation and Creep Damage Assessments—A Comparison of ASME N-47 and GLOSS Time-Scaling Methods

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/112554
    Collections
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorR. Seshadri
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:42:27Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:42:27Z
    date copyrightFebruary, 1993
    date issued1993
    identifier issn0094-9930
    identifier otherJPVTAS-28341#32_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/112554
    description abstractTwo simplified methods for determining multiaxial relaxation and creep damage, the GLOSS time-scaling and the ASME Code Case N-47 method, are described in this paper. The theoretical basis and applicability of the methods to various pressure component configurations are discussed in detail. The G -factor in the ASME formula in effect speeds up or slows down the uniaxial relaxation process, similar to the GLOSS time-scaling method. The two methods are compared, and the differences are attributed to local follow-up not being accounted for in the ASME formula.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleMultiaxial Relaxation and Creep Damage Assessments—A Comparison of ASME N-47 and GLOSS Time-Scaling Methods
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume115
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2929492
    journal fristpage32
    journal lastpage37
    identifier eissn1528-8978
    keywordsCreep
    keywordsRelaxation (Physics)
    keywordsFormulas
    keywordsASME Standards AND Pressure
    treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1993:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian