| contributor author | R. Seshadri | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:42:27Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T23:42:27Z | |
| date copyright | February, 1993 | |
| date issued | 1993 | |
| identifier issn | 0094-9930 | |
| identifier other | JPVTAS-28341#32_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/112554 | |
| description abstract | Two simplified methods for determining multiaxial relaxation and creep damage, the GLOSS time-scaling and the ASME Code Case N-47 method, are described in this paper. The theoretical basis and applicability of the methods to various pressure component configurations are discussed in detail. The G -factor in the ASME formula in effect speeds up or slows down the uniaxial relaxation process, similar to the GLOSS time-scaling method. The two methods are compared, and the differences are attributed to local follow-up not being accounted for in the ASME formula. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Multiaxial Relaxation and Creep Damage Assessments—A Comparison of ASME N-47 and GLOSS Time-Scaling Methods | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 115 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2929492 | |
| journal fristpage | 32 | |
| journal lastpage | 37 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8978 | |
| keywords | Creep | |
| keywords | Relaxation (Physics) | |
| keywords | Formulas | |
| keywords | ASME Standards AND Pressure | |
| tree | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1993:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |
