Show simple item record

contributor authorR. Seshadri
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:42:27Z
date available2017-05-08T23:42:27Z
date copyrightFebruary, 1993
date issued1993
identifier issn0094-9930
identifier otherJPVTAS-28341#32_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/112554
description abstractTwo simplified methods for determining multiaxial relaxation and creep damage, the GLOSS time-scaling and the ASME Code Case N-47 method, are described in this paper. The theoretical basis and applicability of the methods to various pressure component configurations are discussed in detail. The G -factor in the ASME formula in effect speeds up or slows down the uniaxial relaxation process, similar to the GLOSS time-scaling method. The two methods are compared, and the differences are attributed to local follow-up not being accounted for in the ASME formula.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleMultiaxial Relaxation and Creep Damage Assessments—A Comparison of ASME N-47 and GLOSS Time-Scaling Methods
typeJournal Paper
journal volume115
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.2929492
journal fristpage32
journal lastpage37
identifier eissn1528-8978
keywordsCreep
keywordsRelaxation (Physics)
keywordsFormulas
keywordsASME Standards AND Pressure
treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1993:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record