Comparative Evaluation of Abrasive Liquid Jet Machining SystemsSource: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1993:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 001::page 44Author:M. Hashish
DOI: 10.1115/1.2901637Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: This paper presents a comparison between two types of abrasive liquid jet cutting systems: entrainment systems, which typically use abrasive-waterjets (AWJs) to perform the cutting; and systems that use directly pumped abrasive slurry jets (ASJs) to perform the cutting. The hardware features and the performance characteristics of the two types of systems are addressed. A simplified analysis indicates that at an abrasive-to-liquid ratio of 1:1, high-pressure directly pumped ASJs are twice as efficient as entrainment AWJs in transferring energy to the particles. Also, directly pumped ASJs are potentially over 20 times as dense with regard to kinetic power delivery to the workpiece. However, high-pressure entrainment AWJs can be more effective than low-pressure directly pumped ASJs.
keyword(s): Pressure , Machining , Particulate matter , Hardware , High pressure (Physics) , Jets , Jet cutting , Slurries , Cutting AND Performance characterization ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | M. Hashish | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:41:55Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T23:41:55Z | |
date copyright | February, 1993 | |
date issued | 1993 | |
identifier issn | 1087-1357 | |
identifier other | JMSEFK-27762#44_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/112265 | |
description abstract | This paper presents a comparison between two types of abrasive liquid jet cutting systems: entrainment systems, which typically use abrasive-waterjets (AWJs) to perform the cutting; and systems that use directly pumped abrasive slurry jets (ASJs) to perform the cutting. The hardware features and the performance characteristics of the two types of systems are addressed. A simplified analysis indicates that at an abrasive-to-liquid ratio of 1:1, high-pressure directly pumped ASJs are twice as efficient as entrainment AWJs in transferring energy to the particles. Also, directly pumped ASJs are potentially over 20 times as dense with regard to kinetic power delivery to the workpiece. However, high-pressure entrainment AWJs can be more effective than low-pressure directly pumped ASJs. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Abrasive Liquid Jet Machining Systems | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 115 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2901637 | |
journal fristpage | 44 | |
journal lastpage | 50 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8935 | |
keywords | Pressure | |
keywords | Machining | |
keywords | Particulate matter | |
keywords | Hardware | |
keywords | High pressure (Physics) | |
keywords | Jets | |
keywords | Jet cutting | |
keywords | Slurries | |
keywords | Cutting AND Performance characterization | |
tree | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1993:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |