Show simple item record

contributor authorM. Hashish
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:41:55Z
date available2017-05-08T23:41:55Z
date copyrightFebruary, 1993
date issued1993
identifier issn1087-1357
identifier otherJMSEFK-27762#44_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/112265
description abstractThis paper presents a comparison between two types of abrasive liquid jet cutting systems: entrainment systems, which typically use abrasive-waterjets (AWJs) to perform the cutting; and systems that use directly pumped abrasive slurry jets (ASJs) to perform the cutting. The hardware features and the performance characteristics of the two types of systems are addressed. A simplified analysis indicates that at an abrasive-to-liquid ratio of 1:1, high-pressure directly pumped ASJs are twice as efficient as entrainment AWJs in transferring energy to the particles. Also, directly pumped ASJs are potentially over 20 times as dense with regard to kinetic power delivery to the workpiece. However, high-pressure entrainment AWJs can be more effective than low-pressure directly pumped ASJs.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparative Evaluation of Abrasive Liquid Jet Machining Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume115
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.2901637
journal fristpage44
journal lastpage50
identifier eissn1528-8935
keywordsPressure
keywordsMachining
keywordsParticulate matter
keywordsHardware
keywordsHigh pressure (Physics)
keywordsJets
keywordsJet cutting
keywordsSlurries
keywordsCutting AND Performance characterization
treeJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1993:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record