Show simple item record

contributor authorM. J. Chaney
contributor authorJ. J. Beaman
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:37:56Z
date available2017-05-08T23:37:56Z
date copyrightSeptember, 1992
date issued1992
identifier issn0022-0434
identifier otherJDSMAA-26185#493_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/109961
description abstractComparisons are made of two pressure-temperature controllers for a wind-tunnel type compressible flow process that includes control of pressures across a converging nozzle. Nonlinear flow characteristics of the nozzle present the key challenge for tracking rapid command trajectories. One controller is a linear integral-plus-state feedback configuration with gain scheduling. The other is a model-following controller that includes a feedforward inverse-process model to decouple and linearize the system. Simulation testing is used to compare the controllers, and sensitivity to feedforward modeling errors and feedback bandwidth is evaluated. Operational and implementation features are also compared.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison of Nonlinear Tracking Controllers for a Compressible Flow Process
typeJournal Paper
journal volume114
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
identifier doi10.1115/1.2897374
journal fristpage493
journal lastpage499
identifier eissn1528-9028
keywordsControl equipment
keywordsCompressible flow
keywordsFeedback
keywordsFeedforward control
keywordsNozzles
keywordsTesting
keywordsPressure
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsTemperature
keywordsSimulation
keywordsGain scheduling
keywordsModeling
keywordsWind tunnels AND Errors
treeJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;1992:;volume( 114 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record