YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Fuel Spray Evolution: Comparison of Experiment and CFD Simulation of Nonevaporating Spray

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1989:;volume( 111 ):;issue: 001::page 15
    Author:
    L. G. Dodge
    ,
    J. A. Schwalb
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3240218
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Detailed spray characteristics were obtained for a small-capacity, pressure-swirl atomizer using an Aerometrics phase-Doppler particle analyzer. Measurements included drop size and velocity distributions, liquid volume fluxes, and air velocities at four axial locations, 25, 50, 75, and 100 mm, with complete radial traverses at each location. Drop size results were compared with measurements from a Malvern laser-diffraction instrument, and integrated liquid volume fluxes were compared with measured flow rates to estimate measurement uncertainties. Drop sizes measured by the two independent techniques and area-weighted-averaged over the radial traverses at each of the four axial stations varied on average by less than 4 percent. Integrated volume flux measurements by the phase-Doppler instrument at four axial stations differed from the nozzle flow rate by at most 19 percent, with some of the difference due to evaporation. The phase-Doppler data were used to begin an evaluation of a commercial two-phase, three-dimensional, CFD code (FLUENT). Using a simplified representation of the spray based on velocity measurements 2 mm from the atomizer, it is shown that the model predicts drop trajectories, velocities, and volume fluxes reasonably well, and air entrainment velocities fairly accurately except on the spray centerline. Drop velocity profiles indicate dense spray effects very close to the atomizer that are not properly predicted by the dilute spray model.
    keyword(s): Fuels , Simulation , Computational fluid dynamics , Sprays , Drops , Flux (Metallurgy) , Measurement , Flow (Dynamics) , Instrumentation , Nozzles , Evaporation , Velocity measurement , Pressure , Diffraction , Lasers AND Particulate matter ,
    • Download: (1.024Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Fuel Spray Evolution: Comparison of Experiment and CFD Simulation of Nonevaporating Spray

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/105422
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorL. G. Dodge
    contributor authorJ. A. Schwalb
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:30:02Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:30:02Z
    date copyrightJanuary, 1989
    date issued1989
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-26662#15_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/105422
    description abstractDetailed spray characteristics were obtained for a small-capacity, pressure-swirl atomizer using an Aerometrics phase-Doppler particle analyzer. Measurements included drop size and velocity distributions, liquid volume fluxes, and air velocities at four axial locations, 25, 50, 75, and 100 mm, with complete radial traverses at each location. Drop size results were compared with measurements from a Malvern laser-diffraction instrument, and integrated liquid volume fluxes were compared with measured flow rates to estimate measurement uncertainties. Drop sizes measured by the two independent techniques and area-weighted-averaged over the radial traverses at each of the four axial stations varied on average by less than 4 percent. Integrated volume flux measurements by the phase-Doppler instrument at four axial stations differed from the nozzle flow rate by at most 19 percent, with some of the difference due to evaporation. The phase-Doppler data were used to begin an evaluation of a commercial two-phase, three-dimensional, CFD code (FLUENT). Using a simplified representation of the spray based on velocity measurements 2 mm from the atomizer, it is shown that the model predicts drop trajectories, velocities, and volume fluxes reasonably well, and air entrainment velocities fairly accurately except on the spray centerline. Drop velocity profiles indicate dense spray effects very close to the atomizer that are not properly predicted by the dilute spray model.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleFuel Spray Evolution: Comparison of Experiment and CFD Simulation of Nonevaporating Spray
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume111
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3240218
    journal fristpage15
    journal lastpage23
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsFuels
    keywordsSimulation
    keywordsComputational fluid dynamics
    keywordsSprays
    keywordsDrops
    keywordsFlux (Metallurgy)
    keywordsMeasurement
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsInstrumentation
    keywordsNozzles
    keywordsEvaporation
    keywordsVelocity measurement
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsDiffraction
    keywordsLasers AND Particulate matter
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1989:;volume( 111 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian