Show simple item record

contributor authorT. L. Vincent
contributor authorS. P. Joshi
contributor authorYeong Ching Lin
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:29:29Z
date available2017-05-08T23:29:29Z
date copyrightDecember, 1989
date issued1989
identifier issn0022-0434
identifier otherJDSMAA-26118#592_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/105115
description abstractIn this paper, we investigate an alternate approach to the design of controllers for positioning and damping of a system which can be reduced to an equivalent system of springs and masses. The approach taken is to design a controller which uses open-loop positioning followed by closed-loop control for damping. By so doing, we can avoid a conflicting requirements problem associated with traditional state variable feedback design. The open-loop portion of the control is based on optimal control theory, which allows for control saturation. In particular, during this phase of the control, the time to position is minimized. This results in a bang-bang type of control. Once the system has been “positioned,” the controller switches to a closed-loop phase. The particular closed-loop control used here is based on energy methods and is not a full state variable feedback design. The method is illustrated using a low-order spring-mass example, and the results are compared with an LQ design.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titlePositioning and Active Damping of Spring-Mass Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume111
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
identifier doi10.1115/1.3153099
journal fristpage592
journal lastpage599
identifier eissn1528-9028
treeJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;1989:;volume( 111 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record