Optimal Design of Compact Spur Gear SetsSource: Journal of Mechanical Design:;1984:;volume( 106 ):;issue: 001::page 95DOI: 10.1115/1.3258568Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: In a recent article [3], Savage, Coy, and Townsend presented a method for the optimal design of compact standard spur gear sets. They gave figures and design rules based on a design model that considered scoring, pitting, bending fatigue, and involute interference. The work reported here expands the Savage, Coy, and Townsend model to include the AGMA geometry and dynamic factors. The extension was possible, in part, due to the appearance of an article by Mitchiner and Mabie [7] which provided a computationally simple means to determine geometry factors. A design strategy is presented and illustrated by examples. The method is available from the second author in the form of a short Fortran program. The code is applicable to spur gear tooth systems where the addenda and dedenda are inversely proportional to diametral pitch (e.g., the standard tooth system). Other developments of the paper include a new derivation of the expression for pinion roll angles and an observation regarding the method of Mitchiner and Mabie [7] which allows a general form to be used in the determination of the geometry factor for any point during the contact cycle.
keyword(s): Design , Gears , Spur gears , Geometry , Fatigue , Cycles , FORTRAN AND Gear teeth ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | R. K. Carroll | |
| contributor author | G. E. Johnson | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:18:33Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T23:18:33Z | |
| date copyright | March, 1984 | |
| date issued | 1984 | |
| identifier issn | 1050-0472 | |
| identifier other | JMDEDB-28037#95_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/98828 | |
| description abstract | In a recent article [3], Savage, Coy, and Townsend presented a method for the optimal design of compact standard spur gear sets. They gave figures and design rules based on a design model that considered scoring, pitting, bending fatigue, and involute interference. The work reported here expands the Savage, Coy, and Townsend model to include the AGMA geometry and dynamic factors. The extension was possible, in part, due to the appearance of an article by Mitchiner and Mabie [7] which provided a computationally simple means to determine geometry factors. A design strategy is presented and illustrated by examples. The method is available from the second author in the form of a short Fortran program. The code is applicable to spur gear tooth systems where the addenda and dedenda are inversely proportional to diametral pitch (e.g., the standard tooth system). Other developments of the paper include a new derivation of the expression for pinion roll angles and an observation regarding the method of Mitchiner and Mabie [7] which allows a general form to be used in the determination of the geometry factor for any point during the contact cycle. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Optimal Design of Compact Spur Gear Sets | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 106 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Mechanical Design | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3258568 | |
| journal fristpage | 95 | |
| journal lastpage | 101 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-9001 | |
| keywords | Design | |
| keywords | Gears | |
| keywords | Spur gears | |
| keywords | Geometry | |
| keywords | Fatigue | |
| keywords | Cycles | |
| keywords | FORTRAN AND Gear teeth | |
| tree | Journal of Mechanical Design:;1984:;volume( 106 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |