YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparative Study of the Amount of Backflow Produced by Four Types of Aortic Valve Prostheses

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;1984:;volume( 106 ):;issue: 001::page 66
    Author:
    H. N. Sabbah
    ,
    P. D. Stein
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3138459
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: To determine the extent of backflow encountered with currently used prosthetic valves, four types of aortic valves with comparable orifice diameters were tested in a pulse duplicating system. These were a Hancock porcine valve, a Lillehei-Kaster pivoting disk valve, a St. Jude bileaflet valve and a Björk-Shiley tilting disk valve. Mean aortic pressure was sequentially increased from 83 to 147 mmHg, keeping the pump rate essentially constant (69–73 strokes/min). The porcine valve produced the least amount of total backflow (backflow due to closure plus leakage backflow) (1.6 to 2.4 mL/stroke). Among the mechanical valves the Björk-Shiley valve showed the least amount of total backflow (5.0 to 6.0 mL/stroke). At a mean aortic pressure of 100 mmHg and a low cardiac output of 2 L/min, the total backflow with the porcine valve was only 6 percent of forward flow; whereas it was 19 percent with the Lillehei-Kaster valve, 22 percent with the St. Jude valve and 18 percent with the Björk-Shiley valve. Leakage backflow at a given level of mean aortic pressure was, as expected, directly related to the annular clearance area. It is concluded that the Hancock valve showed the least amount of backward flow, which would be particularly beneficial in low output states. In the presence of normal hemodynamics, the amount of backflow with the three mechanical valves appeared to be well below the level of backflow considered to be clinically significant.
    keyword(s): Prostheses , Valves , Pressure , Flow (Dynamics) , Disks , Leakage , Artificial limbs , Hemodynamics , Clearances (Engineering) AND Pumps ,
    • Download: (582.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparative Study of the Amount of Backflow Produced by Four Types of Aortic Valve Prostheses

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/98187
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorH. N. Sabbah
    contributor authorP. D. Stein
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:17:23Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:17:23Z
    date copyrightFebruary, 1984
    date issued1984
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherJBENDY-25772#66_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/98187
    description abstractTo determine the extent of backflow encountered with currently used prosthetic valves, four types of aortic valves with comparable orifice diameters were tested in a pulse duplicating system. These were a Hancock porcine valve, a Lillehei-Kaster pivoting disk valve, a St. Jude bileaflet valve and a Björk-Shiley tilting disk valve. Mean aortic pressure was sequentially increased from 83 to 147 mmHg, keeping the pump rate essentially constant (69–73 strokes/min). The porcine valve produced the least amount of total backflow (backflow due to closure plus leakage backflow) (1.6 to 2.4 mL/stroke). Among the mechanical valves the Björk-Shiley valve showed the least amount of total backflow (5.0 to 6.0 mL/stroke). At a mean aortic pressure of 100 mmHg and a low cardiac output of 2 L/min, the total backflow with the porcine valve was only 6 percent of forward flow; whereas it was 19 percent with the Lillehei-Kaster valve, 22 percent with the St. Jude valve and 18 percent with the Björk-Shiley valve. Leakage backflow at a given level of mean aortic pressure was, as expected, directly related to the annular clearance area. It is concluded that the Hancock valve showed the least amount of backward flow, which would be particularly beneficial in low output states. In the presence of normal hemodynamics, the amount of backflow with the three mechanical valves appeared to be well below the level of backflow considered to be clinically significant.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparative Study of the Amount of Backflow Produced by Four Types of Aortic Valve Prostheses
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume106
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3138459
    journal fristpage66
    journal lastpage71
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    keywordsProstheses
    keywordsValves
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsDisks
    keywordsLeakage
    keywordsArtificial limbs
    keywordsHemodynamics
    keywordsClearances (Engineering) AND Pumps
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;1984:;volume( 106 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian