Show simple item record

contributor authorP. Bendt
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:16:30Z
date available2017-05-08T23:16:30Z
date copyrightFebruary, 1983
date issued1983
identifier issn0199-6231
identifier otherJSEEDO-28156#66_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/97648
description abstractIt is generally assumed that a solar heating system should be sized by minimizing its life-cycle cost. This study shows, however, that the uncertainty in future economic trends makes the results of such a procedure questionable. The design conditions for minimum cost are extremely broad and all practical systems have a solar fraction within the limited range of 30 to 90 percent. Thus, by choosing only three collector areas that give systems within this range, one is assured of selecting a nearly optimal system for any realistic economic scenario. Selecting one of these three systems is essentially equivalent to economic optimization, but simpler. Procedures are derived in this paper for determining the sizes of the three systems. The conclusion is that the collector areas should be about 1/8, 1/5, and 1/3 of the building floor area. This rule of thumb eliminates the need to design solar systems individually, allowing the possiblity of mass-produced homes with standardized solar heating systems.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAppropriate Sizing of Solar Heating Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume105
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Solar Energy Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.3266348
journal fristpage66
journal lastpage72
identifier eissn1528-8986
keywordsSolar heating
keywordsDesign
keywordsSolar energy
keywordsLife cycle costing
keywordsOptimization AND Uncertainty
treeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering:;1983:;volume( 105 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record