YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of Two Optical Techniques for Measuring Cavitation Nuclei

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1981:;volume( 103 ):;issue: 001::page 8
    Author:
    M. L. Billet
    ,
    E. M. Gates
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3240790
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Several devices have been developed or adapted to the use of measuring “nucleating sources” in a liquid including acoustic methods, direct observation (e.g. microscopy and holography), single particle counters, light scattering and light extinction. With experience two techniques have become more favored than the others, namely: holography and light scattering. However, with the exception of Peterson et al’s study no attempt has been made to simultaneously compare these two techniques under actual test conditions so that some confidence may be gained in deducing the number and type of nuclei from the record produced by either method. The purpose of the present paper is then to report and compare some nuclei populations which were recorded simultaneously by both methods during a series of cavitation inception tests. Measurements of nuclei populations were made in two facilities located at the California Institute of Technology, the Low Turbulence Water Tunnel (LTWT) and the High Speed Water Tunnel (HSWT) which are known to have substantially different nuclei distributions. In each facility nuclei populations were recorded at various combinations of tunnel velocity, pressure and pressure-time histories in an effort to produce different distributions and also to enable one to deduce from the laser scattering results the composition of the nuclei, i.e., solid particulates or bubbles. This deduction could then be checked with the holographic results. Simultaneous nuclei population measurements were recorded in the LTWT, whereas measurements of nuclei in the HSWT were obtained at separate times approximately eleven months apart. Since both methods have different characteristic size detection ranges, they could be compared directly only in the overlapping size range, namely: 10-50 microns diameter. In the LTWT where the populations were recorded simultaneously, there was some good agreement between not only the numbers but also the type of nuclei (mainly gas bubbles). However, the scattering technique indicated somewhat fewer nuclei in most cases. In addition, the scattering technique indicated fewer nuclei in the HSWT than had been previously measured by holography. Although there was some discrepancy between numbers of nuclei, both techniques demonstrated (directly from holography and by inference from the scattering results) that the nuclei were primarily solid particulates rather than gas bubbles.
    keyword(s): Cavitation , Radiation scattering , Electromagnetic scattering , Holography , Measurement , Bubbles , Water tunnels , Light scattering , Pressure , Particulate matter , Turbulence , Acoustics , Radiation counters , Lasers , Microscopy AND Tunnels ,
    • Download: (961.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of Two Optical Techniques for Measuring Cavitation Nuclei

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/94745
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorM. L. Billet
    contributor authorE. M. Gates
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:11:29Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:11:29Z
    date copyrightMarch, 1981
    date issued1981
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-26968#8_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/94745
    description abstractSeveral devices have been developed or adapted to the use of measuring “nucleating sources” in a liquid including acoustic methods, direct observation (e.g. microscopy and holography), single particle counters, light scattering and light extinction. With experience two techniques have become more favored than the others, namely: holography and light scattering. However, with the exception of Peterson et al’s study no attempt has been made to simultaneously compare these two techniques under actual test conditions so that some confidence may be gained in deducing the number and type of nuclei from the record produced by either method. The purpose of the present paper is then to report and compare some nuclei populations which were recorded simultaneously by both methods during a series of cavitation inception tests. Measurements of nuclei populations were made in two facilities located at the California Institute of Technology, the Low Turbulence Water Tunnel (LTWT) and the High Speed Water Tunnel (HSWT) which are known to have substantially different nuclei distributions. In each facility nuclei populations were recorded at various combinations of tunnel velocity, pressure and pressure-time histories in an effort to produce different distributions and also to enable one to deduce from the laser scattering results the composition of the nuclei, i.e., solid particulates or bubbles. This deduction could then be checked with the holographic results. Simultaneous nuclei population measurements were recorded in the LTWT, whereas measurements of nuclei in the HSWT were obtained at separate times approximately eleven months apart. Since both methods have different characteristic size detection ranges, they could be compared directly only in the overlapping size range, namely: 10-50 microns diameter. In the LTWT where the populations were recorded simultaneously, there was some good agreement between not only the numbers but also the type of nuclei (mainly gas bubbles). However, the scattering technique indicated somewhat fewer nuclei in most cases. In addition, the scattering technique indicated fewer nuclei in the HSWT than had been previously measured by holography. Although there was some discrepancy between numbers of nuclei, both techniques demonstrated (directly from holography and by inference from the scattering results) that the nuclei were primarily solid particulates rather than gas bubbles.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Comparison of Two Optical Techniques for Measuring Cavitation Nuclei
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume103
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3240790
    journal fristpage8
    journal lastpage13
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsCavitation
    keywordsRadiation scattering
    keywordsElectromagnetic scattering
    keywordsHolography
    keywordsMeasurement
    keywordsBubbles
    keywordsWater tunnels
    keywordsLight scattering
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsParticulate matter
    keywordsTurbulence
    keywordsAcoustics
    keywordsRadiation counters
    keywordsLasers
    keywordsMicroscopy AND Tunnels
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1981:;volume( 103 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian