YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Calculation of Annular and Twin Parallel Jets Using Various Discretization Schemes and Turbulence-Model Variations

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1981:;volume( 103 ):;issue: 002::page 352
    Author:
    M. A. Leschziner
    ,
    W. Rodi
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3241745
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The paper examines the performance of three discretization schemes for convection and three turbulence-model variations when used to simulate the recirculating flow in an annular and a plane twin-parallel jet in still air. The discretization schemes considered are: (i) the hybrid central/upwind differencing scheme (CUDS), (ii) the hybrid central/skew-upwind differencing scheme (CSUDS) and (iii) the quadratic, upstream-weighted differencing scheme (QUDS). Of these, the second and third were proposed recently as superior alternatives to the first in respect of numerical diffusion. The turbulence models examined are the standard k-ε model and two variants of this. The first accounts for effects of streamline curvature on turbulence and the second for the preferential influence of normal stresses on the dissipation of turbulence energy. It is shown that numerical scheme (i) results, particularly in conjunction with the turbulence-model modifications, in severe solution errors and in a generally anomalous response to changes in the modelled viscosity field. In contrast, schemes (ii) and (iii) yield, in all cases, similar results and respond in an expected manner to the modifications. The modifications, particularly that accounting for streamline curvature, reduce, in some cases drastically, the discrepancies between computed and experimental data and yield for both jets examined generally satisfactory results.
    keyword(s): Turbulence , Jets , Convection , Errors , Flow (Dynamics) , Diffusion (Physics) , Viscosity , Stress AND Energy dissipation ,
    • Download: (837.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Calculation of Annular and Twin Parallel Jets Using Various Discretization Schemes and Turbulence-Model Variations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/94734
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorM. A. Leschziner
    contributor authorW. Rodi
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:11:28Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:11:28Z
    date copyrightJune, 1981
    date issued1981
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-26971#352_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/94734
    description abstractThe paper examines the performance of three discretization schemes for convection and three turbulence-model variations when used to simulate the recirculating flow in an annular and a plane twin-parallel jet in still air. The discretization schemes considered are: (i) the hybrid central/upwind differencing scheme (CUDS), (ii) the hybrid central/skew-upwind differencing scheme (CSUDS) and (iii) the quadratic, upstream-weighted differencing scheme (QUDS). Of these, the second and third were proposed recently as superior alternatives to the first in respect of numerical diffusion. The turbulence models examined are the standard k-ε model and two variants of this. The first accounts for effects of streamline curvature on turbulence and the second for the preferential influence of normal stresses on the dissipation of turbulence energy. It is shown that numerical scheme (i) results, particularly in conjunction with the turbulence-model modifications, in severe solution errors and in a generally anomalous response to changes in the modelled viscosity field. In contrast, schemes (ii) and (iii) yield, in all cases, similar results and respond in an expected manner to the modifications. The modifications, particularly that accounting for streamline curvature, reduce, in some cases drastically, the discrepancies between computed and experimental data and yield for both jets examined generally satisfactory results.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleCalculation of Annular and Twin Parallel Jets Using Various Discretization Schemes and Turbulence-Model Variations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume103
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3241745
    journal fristpage352
    journal lastpage360
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsTurbulence
    keywordsJets
    keywordsConvection
    keywordsErrors
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsDiffusion (Physics)
    keywordsViscosity
    keywordsStress AND Energy dissipation
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1981:;volume( 103 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian