YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Economic Sizing of Steam Piping and Insulation

    Source: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1979:;volume( 101 ):;issue: 004::page 427
    Author:
    W. J. Wepfer
    ,
    R. A. Gaggioli
    ,
    E. F. Obert
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3439532
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper presents a simple method for the optimal economic selection of pipe size and insulation thickness for steam piping systems. The primary operating costs inherent in any such system are consequences of fluid-flow friction and heat transfer losses. Striving to conserve energy, the engineer is motivated to select large pipe diameters and insulation thicknesses. But how large should the pipe diameter be and how much insulation is necessary? The answer is simply to make that investment in piping and insulation which minimizes the sum of the capital and operating costs (friction and heat transfer). Thus it is imperative that the operating expenses be precisely evaluated. The key is the recognition that it is available energy which is the commodity of value—that it is necessary to assign an economic value (cost) to the steam based on its available energy content. Because friction and heat transfer destroy available energy, their respective costs can then be accurately assessed. As an example a bleeder steam line that delivers 55,300 lbm/hr (7 kg/s) at 93.8 psia (0.65 MPa) and 603 F (317 C) to a feedwater heater is analyzed to show the optimal nominal pipe diameter and insulation thickness to be 12 in. (30.48 cm) and 3.5 in. (8.89 cm), respectively.
    keyword(s): Pipes , Insulation , Steam , Exergy , Friction , Heat transfer , Thickness , Pipe sizes , Engineers , Feedwater , Fluid dynamics AND Piping systems ,
    • Download: (623.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Economic Sizing of Steam Piping and Insulation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/92365
    Collections
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorW. J. Wepfer
    contributor authorR. A. Gaggioli
    contributor authorE. F. Obert
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:07:09Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:07:09Z
    date copyrightNovember, 1979
    date issued1979
    identifier issn1087-1357
    identifier otherJMSEFK-27681#427_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/92365
    description abstractThis paper presents a simple method for the optimal economic selection of pipe size and insulation thickness for steam piping systems. The primary operating costs inherent in any such system are consequences of fluid-flow friction and heat transfer losses. Striving to conserve energy, the engineer is motivated to select large pipe diameters and insulation thicknesses. But how large should the pipe diameter be and how much insulation is necessary? The answer is simply to make that investment in piping and insulation which minimizes the sum of the capital and operating costs (friction and heat transfer). Thus it is imperative that the operating expenses be precisely evaluated. The key is the recognition that it is available energy which is the commodity of value—that it is necessary to assign an economic value (cost) to the steam based on its available energy content. Because friction and heat transfer destroy available energy, their respective costs can then be accurately assessed. As an example a bleeder steam line that delivers 55,300 lbm/hr (7 kg/s) at 93.8 psia (0.65 MPa) and 603 F (317 C) to a feedwater heater is analyzed to show the optimal nominal pipe diameter and insulation thickness to be 12 in. (30.48 cm) and 3.5 in. (8.89 cm), respectively.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleEconomic Sizing of Steam Piping and Insulation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume101
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3439532
    journal fristpage427
    journal lastpage433
    identifier eissn1528-8935
    keywordsPipes
    keywordsInsulation
    keywordsSteam
    keywordsExergy
    keywordsFriction
    keywordsHeat transfer
    keywordsThickness
    keywordsPipe sizes
    keywordsEngineers
    keywordsFeedwater
    keywordsFluid dynamics AND Piping systems
    treeJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1979:;volume( 101 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian