YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Dynamic Fracture Initiation: A Comparison of Two Experimental Methods

    Source: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;1979:;volume( 101 ):;issue: 002::page 168
    Author:
    L. S. Costin
    ,
    W. L. Server
    ,
    J. Duffy
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3443670
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper presents a comparison of dynamic fracture initiation results obtained from two independent experimental methods: (1) the instrumented version of the precracked Charpy test and (2) a new dynamic fracture test developed at Brown University (BU). Dynamic fracture tests were conducted using both methods on 4340 steel at room temperature and on 1018 cold-rolled steel (CRS) at temperatures over the range −157 to 107°C. This range covered temperatures on the lower shelf, the transition regime, and the upper shelf of the transition temperature curve. Stress intensity rates of K̇I = 2.2 × 105 MN-m−3/2 /s and K̇I = 2.2 × 106 MN-m−3/2 /s were used in the instrumented precracked Charpy and BU tests, respectively. In the analysis of test results, both elastic (KIc ) and elastic-plastic (J-integral) fracture parameters were computed. Results of the two test methods were found to be generally in good agreement, except that some differences were observed between 1018 CRS test results on the upper shelf. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.
    keyword(s): Experimental methods , Fracture (Process) , Temperature , Steel , Stress AND Phase transition temperature ,
    • Download: (494.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Dynamic Fracture Initiation: A Comparison of Two Experimental Methods

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/92222
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorL. S. Costin
    contributor authorW. L. Server
    contributor authorJ. Duffy
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:06:53Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:06:53Z
    date copyrightApril, 1979
    date issued1979
    identifier issn0094-4289
    identifier otherJEMTA8-26868#168_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/92222
    description abstractThis paper presents a comparison of dynamic fracture initiation results obtained from two independent experimental methods: (1) the instrumented version of the precracked Charpy test and (2) a new dynamic fracture test developed at Brown University (BU). Dynamic fracture tests were conducted using both methods on 4340 steel at room temperature and on 1018 cold-rolled steel (CRS) at temperatures over the range −157 to 107°C. This range covered temperatures on the lower shelf, the transition regime, and the upper shelf of the transition temperature curve. Stress intensity rates of K̇I = 2.2 × 105 MN-m−3/2 /s and K̇I = 2.2 × 106 MN-m−3/2 /s were used in the instrumented precracked Charpy and BU tests, respectively. In the analysis of test results, both elastic (KIc ) and elastic-plastic (J-integral) fracture parameters were computed. Results of the two test methods were found to be generally in good agreement, except that some differences were observed between 1018 CRS test results on the upper shelf. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleDynamic Fracture Initiation: A Comparison of Two Experimental Methods
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume101
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3443670
    journal fristpage168
    journal lastpage172
    identifier eissn1528-8889
    keywordsExperimental methods
    keywordsFracture (Process)
    keywordsTemperature
    keywordsSteel
    keywordsStress AND Phase transition temperature
    treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;1979:;volume( 101 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian