Tool-Life Distributions—Part 2: Multiple-Injury Tool-Life ModelSource: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1977:;volume( 099 ):;issue: 003::page 523Author:S. Ramalingam
DOI: 10.1115/1.3439272Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The single-injury tool-life model developed in Part 1 of this paper is extended to the case of tool failure due to a multitude of injuries. The expected tool-life distribution in the case of tool failure from multiple injuries due to constant, time-independent stochastic hazards is shown to be a gamma distribution. The result obtained is based on a linear wear-rate assumption. The model is further extended to ensure applicability in the nonlinear wear region. It is shown that the expectation of a log-normal tool-life distribution when tool failure is due to crater wear is not unrealistic. No specific mechanism of tool wear is used to develop the model. The nature of the hazards and the wear mechanisms that are consistent with the multiple-injury tool-life model will be discussed in a subsequent work.
keyword(s): Wounds , Wear , Failure AND Mechanisms ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | S. Ramalingam | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:03:19Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T23:03:19Z | |
date copyright | August, 1977 | |
date issued | 1977 | |
identifier issn | 1087-1357 | |
identifier other | JMSEFK-27662#523_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/90160 | |
description abstract | The single-injury tool-life model developed in Part 1 of this paper is extended to the case of tool failure due to a multitude of injuries. The expected tool-life distribution in the case of tool failure from multiple injuries due to constant, time-independent stochastic hazards is shown to be a gamma distribution. The result obtained is based on a linear wear-rate assumption. The model is further extended to ensure applicability in the nonlinear wear region. It is shown that the expectation of a log-normal tool-life distribution when tool failure is due to crater wear is not unrealistic. No specific mechanism of tool wear is used to develop the model. The nature of the hazards and the wear mechanisms that are consistent with the multiple-injury tool-life model will be discussed in a subsequent work. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Tool-Life Distributions—Part 2: Multiple-Injury Tool-Life Model | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 99 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3439272 | |
journal fristpage | 523 | |
journal lastpage | 528 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8935 | |
keywords | Wounds | |
keywords | Wear | |
keywords | Failure AND Mechanisms | |
tree | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1977:;volume( 099 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |