YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Hydrostatic versus Nonhydrostatic Euler-Equation Modeling of Nonlinear Internal Waves

    Source: Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 010
    Author:
    Bridget M. Wadzuk
    ,
    Ben R. Hodges
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:10(1069)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Basin-scale internal waves are inherently nonhydrostatic; however, they are frequently resolved features in three-dimensional hydrostatic lake and coastal ocean models. Comparison of hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic formulations of the Centre for Water Research Estuary and Lake Computer Model provides insight into the similarities and differences between these representations of internal waves. Comparisons to prior laboratory experiments are used to demonstrate the expected wave evolution. The hydrostatic model cannot replicate basin-scale wave degeneration into a solitary wave train, whereas a nonhydrostatic model does represent the downscaling of energy. However, the hydrostatic model produces a nonlinear traveling borelike feature that has similarities to the mean evolution of the nonhydrostatic wave.
    • Download: (939.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Hydrostatic versus Nonhydrostatic Euler-Equation Modeling of Nonlinear Internal Waves

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/86613
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBridget M. Wadzuk
    contributor authorBen R. Hodges
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:41:27Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:41:27Z
    date copyrightOctober 2009
    date issued2009
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%282009%29135%3A10%281069%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/86613
    description abstractBasin-scale internal waves are inherently nonhydrostatic; however, they are frequently resolved features in three-dimensional hydrostatic lake and coastal ocean models. Comparison of hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic formulations of the Centre for Water Research Estuary and Lake Computer Model provides insight into the similarities and differences between these representations of internal waves. Comparisons to prior laboratory experiments are used to demonstrate the expected wave evolution. The hydrostatic model cannot replicate basin-scale wave degeneration into a solitary wave train, whereas a nonhydrostatic model does represent the downscaling of energy. However, the hydrostatic model produces a nonlinear traveling borelike feature that has similarities to the mean evolution of the nonhydrostatic wave.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleHydrostatic versus Nonhydrostatic Euler-Equation Modeling of Nonlinear Internal Waves
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume135
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:10(1069)
    treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian