Show simple item record

contributor authorBridget M. Wadzuk
contributor authorBen R. Hodges
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:41:27Z
date available2017-05-08T22:41:27Z
date copyrightOctober 2009
date issued2009
identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%282009%29135%3A10%281069%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/86613
description abstractBasin-scale internal waves are inherently nonhydrostatic; however, they are frequently resolved features in three-dimensional hydrostatic lake and coastal ocean models. Comparison of hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic formulations of the Centre for Water Research Estuary and Lake Computer Model provides insight into the similarities and differences between these representations of internal waves. Comparisons to prior laboratory experiments are used to demonstrate the expected wave evolution. The hydrostatic model cannot replicate basin-scale wave degeneration into a solitary wave train, whereas a nonhydrostatic model does represent the downscaling of energy. However, the hydrostatic model produces a nonlinear traveling borelike feature that has similarities to the mean evolution of the nonhydrostatic wave.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleHydrostatic versus Nonhydrostatic Euler-Equation Modeling of Nonlinear Internal Waves
typeJournal Paper
journal volume135
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:10(1069)
treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record